LillianFaderman
2lookingforthegoodwar
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
1empireofpain
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
7albion
1theleasofus
11632
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2paradise
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
4confidencegames
10abion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2confidencegames
2defense
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
8albion'
Learned Hand 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
2gucci
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
6confidencegames
11albion
1lauber
4albion
1trap
12albion
1defense
storyparadox3
7confidencegames
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
2lafayette
2jesusandjohnwayne
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
5confidencegames
199
1gucci
9albion
399
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1confidencegames
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
13albion
AlexRosenberg
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
6albion
1paradide
2theleastofus
Richard Posner 360x1000
5albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2transadentilist
1madoff
299
Betty Friedan 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
3paradise
Tad Friend 360x1000
14albion
2trap
3confidencegames
Storyparadox1
storyparadox2
1falsewitness
499
3defense
1albion
2falsewitness
3albion
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2albion
1transcendentalist
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000

The IRS Chief Counsel has signaled with CCA 202130014 that the Service will be continuing its hard line on conservation easements.  The engine of every abusive syndicated conservation easement is a vastly inflated appraisal.  Rather than focus on the appraisal issue, IRS has instead gone after technical flaws in the easement documents.  What is disturbing about that approach is that it might be applicable to legitimate easement transactions.

About Easement Deductions

There is a general rule that partial interests in property are not deductible as charitable contributions.  Qualified easements are an exception to that rule.  Since there is not a lot of buying and selling of easements, they are usually valued on a before and after basis.  The before value is where all the shenanigans are, but that is not what the CCA is about.  The CCA is about “perpetuity”.

Forever Is A Long Long Time

One of the requirements of a qualified easement is that it be perpetual, which is a really long time and as a practical matter nothing on earth can be truly perpetual.  In order to make things as perpetual as possible, the regulations provide that in the event of a judicial termination of the easement, say from a taking by eminent domain, the proceeds have to be split in accordance with the percentage of value established at the time of the easement.  And the qualified organization that hold the easement has to use its share for conservation purposes.

But what about improvements that are made subsequent to the easement?  You have a piece of land on which you could conceivably have built 100 houses.  It is worth $10 million or so you say.  You give an easement to a land trust which allows you to build one house.  Now the land is worth $100,000.  Or so you say for purposes of your charitable contribution of $9.9 million.  You use half or so of your tax savings to build a $2 million house.

Years go by and things change.  The property is taken by eminent domain.  The state is less sanguine about the prospects of the property and gives $4 million for it.  You want a deal that gives you $2 million off the top for the house and a 99% split to the land trust on the balance.  According to the ruling and the IRS position in court where they have generally been winning, you flunk the perpetuity requirement.  No deduction for you.

Suggested Language

Something that the advocates of legitimate conservation easements might appreciate is that the CCA includes suggested language to satisfy the perpetuity requirement.

Donor agrees that the donation of the perpetual conservation restriction described in this deed gives rise to a property right, immediately vested in the donee organization, with a fair market value that is at least equal to the proportionate value that the perpetual conservation restriction, at the time of the gift, bears to the fair market value of the property as a whole at that time. For purposes of this paragraph, the proportionate value of the donee organization’s property rights shall remain constant.

On a subsequent sale, exchange, or involuntary conversion of the subject property, the donee organization will be entitled to a portion of the proceeds at least equal to that proportionate value of the perpetual conservation restriction.

All of the donee organization’s proceeds from a subsequent sale or exchange of the property must be used by the donee organization in a manner consistent with the conservation purposes of the original contribution’

What would be really equitable would be for the IRS to allow donors and land trusts to retroactively fix documents that fail the requirement.  The abusive syndicated conservations easements deserve to be crushed, but it should not be at the expense of legitimate deals.

Other Coverage

Ed Zollars had IRS Memorandum Indicates Limits on the Terms of Conservation Easements.

For a decade’s worth of coverage of tax aspects of easements check out my Conservation Easement Tax Deduction Coverage Round Up.


Originally published on Forbes.com.

For great value continuing professional education.  I recommend the Boston Tax Institute

You can register on-line or reach them by phone (561) 268 – 2269 or email vc@bostontaxinstitute.com.  Mention Your Tax Matters Partner if you contact them.