Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
2gucci
2lafayette
2defense
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
2paradise
10abion
2albion
1defense
storyparadox3
1lookingforthegoodwar
1jesusandjohnwayne
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1transcendentalist
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
3confidencegames
5confidencegames
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
13albion
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
399
2trap
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
2theleastofus
12albion
1paradide
6albion
Learned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
4confidencegames
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Storyparadox1
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
3paradise
2confidencegames
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
1lauber
9albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
LillianFaderman
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
4albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1lafayette
2transadentilist
3albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
3theleastofus
lifeinmiddlemarch2
1falsewitness
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1confidencegames
1theleasofus
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
299
1empireofpain
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
499
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
5albion
7albion
2falsewitness
2lookingforthegoodwar
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
3defense
storyparadox2
Maria Popova 360x1000
7confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
1madoff
8albion'
6confidencegames
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
199
1trap
1gucci
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
11632
14albion
11albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Doctor Dino’s Lawsuit Against Mark Stoney A Revised Complaint

Doctor Dino’s Lawsuit Against Mark Stoney A Revised Complaint

Defamation/malicious prosecution claims have merit if malice proven, but speech defenses often prevail in similar critic-vs-public-figure cases (e.g., celebrity defamation suits dismissed). Could survive motion to dismiss (complaint detailed), but summary judgment likely if discovery shows Stoney’s good faith.

read more
Scholar Al Strikes At Dixieland Boondockery Again

Scholar Al Strikes At Dixieland Boondockery Again

So IRS wanted to give them zero, Judge Lauber allowed them in my mind a substantial deduction well over $150,000. On a percentage basis, it is not so much – slightly over 0.15%.  Just to be clear that is not 15% of the total claimed. It is 15% of 1% of the total claimed.  I am pretty sure that is as low as it has gone without going to zero.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.