399
2jesusandjohnwayne
Edmund Burke 360x1000
7albion
10abion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2transadentilist
3albion
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1madoff
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2gucci
Storyparadox1
11albion
1lauber
2theleastofus
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Learned Hand 360x1000
LillianFaderman
5confidencegames
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2lafayette
1gucci
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
9albion
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2falsewitness
1empireofpain
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1confidencegames
7confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
4confidencegames
1paradide
2trap
2paradise
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
4albion
199
5albion
6albion
1albion
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1defense
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
11632
1theleasofus
storyparadox2
13albion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
299
3theleastofus
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
1falsewitness
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
2confidencegames
2defense
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
14albion
2albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
1transcendentalist
AlexRosenberg
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
3confidencegames
3paradise
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
12albion
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1trap
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
storyparadox3
499
3defense
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
6confidencegames
8albion'
1lafayette
2lookingforthegoodwar
Tad Friend 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.