Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Storyparadox1
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2trap
3theleastofus
3confidencegames
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2lafayette
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
4confidencegames
storyparadox2
14albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1trap
3defense
3paradise
1lauber
LillianFaderman
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2falsewitness
11albion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
4albion
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
1lafayette
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
5confidencegames
Maria Popova 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1madoff
George F Wil...360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
7albion
8albion'
1paradide
1falsewitness
2theleastofus
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
6confidencegames
2confidencegames
2paradise
2transadentilist
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
12albion
2defense
lifeinmiddlemarch1
299
499
1confidencegames
11632
1transcendentalist
399
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
2gucci
1defense
1gucci
5albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
199
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
3albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
1empireofpain
storyparadox3
1albion
1theleasofus
1lookingforthegoodwar
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
10abion
9albion
6albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
7confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
13albion
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000

Shortly after the release of the One Big Beautiful Bill, I noted an apparent marriage penalty in the No Tax on Tips provision.  My friend Grok told me that I was the first commentator to take note of it, but I take compliments from Grok with a grain of salt. You can’t take the “No Tax” in the title literally.  The provision is an income tax deduction subject to a phase-out, which I’m not going to get into here and a limitation, which is where the marriage penalty comes in.

The Limitation

Both the tips deduction and a similar overtime deduction require that married taxpayers file a joint return in order to claim the deduction. And they both have a limitation.  In the case of the overtime deduction it is $12,500 on a single return and $25,000 on a joint return.  For the tip deduction the limit is $25,000.  So it is a better deal for single well-tipped individuals than it is for single individuals who work a lot of overtime. Looking at it negatively, though, there could be a significant marriage penalty for well tipped individuals who tie the knot.  They had a $25,000 deduction limit on each of their single returns or a total of $50,000 and now they share a $25,000 limit.

Nevada Congresspeople Weigh In

I wasn’t the only person to notice this.  Most notably the Democrats in Nevada’s congressional delegation noticed. They joined in writing a letter to the IRS encouraging IRS to interpret the “No Tax on Tips” provision in a taxpayer friendly manner.  The letter, signed by Senators Masto and Rosen and Representatives Titus, Horsford and Lee, addresses issues like auto-gratuities, the Gaming Industry Tip Compliance Agreement, joint returns with ITINs rather than Social Security numbers, specified service trade or business restrictions, which I addressed here, and the marriage penalty.

Here is what the senators and representatives have to say about the marriage penalty.

“Section 70201 provides that “the amount allowed as a deduction under this section for any taxable year shall not exceed $25,000” but does not specify if this amount applies in the case of a joint return. Such an interpretation would create a substantial marriage penalty for couples with two tipped wage earners and we urge IRS and Treasury to allow up to $25,000 per individual, even if filing jointly as mandated by the statute for married couples. A $50,000 cap on joint returns aligns with Congressional intent, as evidence by the phase out language under §224(b)(2)(A), which states that the deduction is reduced “by $100 for each $1,000 by which the taxpayer’s MAGI exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 in the case of a joint return).” It is clear from this language, which provides for a phaseout at double the income level for joint returns, that Congress intended the deduction cap to be doubled in the case of a joint return and for the $25,000 limit to be applied on an individual basis.”

That thing about it being clear that Congress intended that the deduction cap be doubled is a little suspicious.  The language on overtime does double the cap from $12,500 to $25,000 so they clearly know how to have language that doubles a cap.

From The IRS

The IRS has issued a draft form to summarize the new deductions from the One Big Beautiful Bill and it appears that it is leaving the marriage penalty intact. We see Line 7 in Part II No Tax on Tips “Enter the smaller of the amount on line 6 or $25,000”.  By way of contrast we see in Part III No Tax on Overtime Line 15 “Enter the smaller of the amount on line 14c or $12,500 ($25,000 if married filing jointly).  Both parts include a caution that joint filing is required for married taxpayers to claim the deduction.

I thought it likely that IRS would create a new form to summarize the deductions.  Parts IV and V cover No Tax on Car Loan Interest and Enhanced Deduction for Seniors.  Interestingly, the car loan interest deduction does not require joint filing.  A couple with two pricey cars should run the numbers on separate filing this year.


Originally published on Forbes.com.

For great value continuing professional education.  I recommend the Boston Tax Institute

You can register on-line or reach them by phone (561) 268-2269 or email vc@bostontaxinstitute.com.  Mention Your Tax Matters Partner if you contact them.


 

For articles oriented toward tax professionals check out Think Outside The Tax Box.

————————————————————————————————————————