9albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
storyparadox2
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
1confidencegames
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2falsewitness
499
lifeinmiddlemarch2
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1jesusandjohnwayne
1paradide
1empireofpain
1lafayette
5confidencegames
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
4confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
2paradise
2lafayette
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1gucci
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
1theleasofus
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
3defense
Storyparadox1
5albion
2trap
1transcendentalist
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2transadentilist
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1madoff
399
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
7albion
13albion
10abion
4albion
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
12albion
2lookingforthegoodwar
1defense
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
3albion
6confidencegames
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
7confidencegames
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
storyparadox3
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
14albion
2defense
Maria Popova 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
11632
AlexRosenberg
2confidencegames
1lauber
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1falsewitness
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
11albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
3confidencegames
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
2albion
1trap
199
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
2theleastofus
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
3theleastofus
8albion'
1albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
6albion
LillianFaderman
3paradise
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
2gucci
299

 

Marcius and Andrea Scaggs will not be contesting their deficiency notice in Tax Court.  They lost their right to appeal to Tax Court by economizing on their Federal Express charges.  There is a website where you can figure these things out, but I’m not certain I got the details right.  I think they saved about four dollars, but it could have been more.  Here is the story from the Tax Court:

Respondent  mailed a notice of deficiency to petitioners’ last known address on April 8, 2011. The 90th day after respondent mailed the notice was Thursday, July 7, 2011, which was not a legal holiday in the District of Columbia The petition was received by the Court and filed on July 12, 2011. The envelope in which the petition was received bears a Federal Express (FedEx) U.S. Airbill with handwritten entries dated July 7, 2011 (FedEx Airbill). 1 The delivery service selected on the FedEx Airbill is “Express Saver Third business day”.

I generally hate letting things go to the last minute, but a Tax Court petition is one of the last things you want to let go to the last minute.  The reason is that if you go past the last minute the petition becomes pointless.  It’s not that you pay a fine or get scolded by the judge.  You simply do not get into the Tax Court which is a safe haven from the IRS wolf at least until the Court issues its decision.  And who knows ? Maybe you will win in Tax Court.

Even if it is day 90, though, and you are nowhere near the Tax Court you still have hope.  Timely mailed is timely filed.

A timely mailed petition may be treated as though it were timely filed. Sec. 7502(a). Thus, if a petition is received by the Court after the expiration of the 90-day period, it is nevertheless deemed to be timely filed if the date of the U.S. Postal Service postmark stamped on the envelope in which the petition was mailed is within the time prescribed for filing.

Surely you can find a post office.  Some people prefer private delivery services, though.  Quite a few years ago, rules were loosened to extend the timely mailed/timely filed rule to private delivery services as long as they are pre-approved by the IRS.  Several FedEx programs were approved:

Thus, effective January 1, 2005, and insofar as FedEx is concerned, the list of designated private delivery services was as follows: FedEx Priority Overnight, FedEx Standard Overnight, FedEx 2 Day, FedEx International Priority, and FedEx International First.

Sadly “Express Saver third business day” is not on the list and:

The 2004 notice expressly states that FedEx is not designated with respect to any type of delivery service not expressly identified. Thus, “Express Saver Third business day” service is not a designated private delivery service

At least the Tax Court was a little sympathetic:

In so holding we acknowledge that the result may appear harsh  ; however, the Court cannot rely on general equitable principles to expand the statutorily prescribed time for filing a petition. 

And offered a ray of hope:

Although petitioners cannot pursue their case in this Court, they are not without a judicial remedy. Specifically, petitioners may pay the tax, file a claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service, and, if their claim is denied, sue for a refund in the appropriate Federal District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

I was glad to note that the Scaggs were pro se.  Otherwise, I would have to visualize what the managing partner of a firm of tax attorneys would be ordering done to the economizing office manager who would be held responsible for this nightmare.  Nobody expects the Spanish Inquistion, but sometimes they get it anyway.

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

Originally published on Forbes.com on September 11th, 2012