3albion
4albion
Betty Friedan 360x1000
4confidencegames
1gucci
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
2transadentilist
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1empireofpain
12albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
13albion
11albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2trap
3paradise
1lookingforthegoodwar
1lauber
299
2falsewitness
2jesusandjohnwayne
Richard Posner 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
7albion
6albion
1transcendentalist
1paradide
1theleasofus
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1trap
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
5albion
1defense
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
2gucci
2lafayette
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
7confidencegames
Edmund Burke 360x1000
3confidencegames
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
8albion'
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
11632
Tad Friend 360x1000
2albion
storyparadox2
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
storyparadox3
LillianFaderman
1albion
2defense
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
9albion
399
2paradise
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
10abion
George F Wil...360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1confidencegames
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1falsewitness
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2confidencegames
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Storyparadox1
1jesusandjohnwayne
3defense
Maria Popova 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
14albion
2theleastofus
199
499
6confidencegames
5confidencegames
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1madoff

The adventures of Kent Hovind, a/k/a Doctor Dino, in Tax Court and other parts of the legal system have gotten me involved in following developments in Creation Science.  Tax bloggers have all been breathlessly following the saga of the IRS Cincinnati gang that couldn’t sort straight and the topic of who else the IRS might be picking on has come up.  Some people think that Kent Hovind was being persecuted for his creation science beliefs.  I have been skeptical about that and now I have a little more evidence that such was not the case.  The Creation Science Hall of Fame announced that it just received its recognition letter from the IRS.   Retroactive to its incorporation CSHOF is a 501(c)(3) public charity.  So your donations to CSHOF are deductible.

The Creation Science Hall of Fame inducted Kent Hovind a few months ago.  The discussion of Dr. Hovind’s legal struggles in his CSHOF bio, if you will excuse the expression, evolved over time.  At one point there was a fairly elaborate characterization of him as a tax protester, but Hovind himself denies that he is a protester. So ultimately discussion of Dr. Hovind’s tax problems in his CSHOF bio became extinct.

The most charitable view is that Dr. Hovind misunderstood the nature of tax exemptions for religious entities.

Churches do not have to apply for exempt status.  This does not mean that some churches are 501(c)(3) organizations and others are not.  Churches are, per se, 501(c)(3) organizations while all other organizations have to apply for the status.   Churches apply for the status, even though they do not have to, in order to have certainty about their classification.

Professor Edward Zelinsky has explained that there is inevitably a problem when it comes to taxes and churches.  You either have entanglement from the government getting caught up in how the church runs in order to apply the tax law to it or you have the boundary problem.  The other thing is that not every “ministry” is a church.  At any rate, I am glad to learn that CSHOF now has its exempt status.
Nick Lally, Chairman of the Board, of CSHOF has issued an appeal to creationists to appeal to Dr. Hovind to stop fighting the IRS:

The message to Dr. Hovind from us Creationists would be simple: We want to convey to Dr. Hovind to give up his Tax Fight with the IRS and concentrate on “Creation Science” where we need him the most.

CSHOF has one other recent piece of big news up on its website.  Walter T. Brown, Jr   has arrived at a pretty firm date for the Great Flood.  There’s a lot to it.  Astronomical observations, some fancy math, historical research all combined, of course, with Scriptural scholarship.

The most-likely date for a “cluster of perihelia” is 3344.5 BC. That is, January of 3344 BC, and six months further back in the past from then. That would put those comets at perihelion in the summer of 3345 BC. Dr. Brown estimates 96 percent confidence for this date. He further estimates an error of about one year.

Maybe next he’ll tackle the other mystery about the Flood – What’s a cubit ?

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

Originally published on Forbes.com May 25th, 2013