Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
12albion
2albion
4albion
2theleastofus
LillianFaderman
Learned Hand 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
2paradise
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
499
Richard Posner 360x1000
11albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
8albion'
5albion
3defense
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
3theleastofus
1gucci
Tad Friend 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
2transadentilist
Maria Popova 360x1000
199
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
4confidencegames
7albion
14albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
George F Wil...360x1000
2trap
7confidencegames
2falsewitness
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1empireofpain
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
11632
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
2defense
Storyparadox1
1lafayette
1defense
10abion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
storyparadox2
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
3albion
1paradide
13albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
5confidencegames
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
3confidencegames
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
2lafayette
2gucci
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1transcendentalist
9albion
AlexRosenberg
1lookingforthegoodwar
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1lauber
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
6albion
1confidencegames
1albion
399
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
299
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
3paradise
2confidencegames
6confidencegames
1madoff
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
storyparadox3
1theleasofus
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
1trap

This post was originally published on Forbes Sep 29, 2015

When I wrote about Donald Trump’s tax plan yesterday, I wrote that I would leave the scoring to the people who did that sort of thing, but that I would be surprised if the plan turned out to be revenue neutral. Well the Tax Foundation, which bills itself as “the nation’s leading independent tax policy research organization” has scored the plan and I am surprised.  I am  surprised at how far from revenue neutral the proposal is.  According to the Tax Foundation, on a static basis the plan would cut revenue over the next decade by $11.98 trillion.

 For perspective, according to this site projected federal revenue for fiscal year 2015 is $3.2 trillion.  So on a lazy math basis, we could call it a third. You know the old joke about a billion here a billion there, pretty soon you are talking about real money.  Doesn’t work that way with a trillion. A trillion is real money all by its lonesome.

But There Will Be Growth

They are onto the growth thing.

However, it also would improve incentives to work and invest, which could increase gross domestic product (GDP) by 11 percent over the long term. This increase in GDP would translate into 6.5 percent higher wages and 5.3 million new full-time equivalent jobs. After accounting for increased incomes due to these factors, the plan would only reduce tax revenues by $10.14 trillion. (Emphasis added)

Early in my parenting days, I adopted a rule with my children, which I have not changed even as they are now in their twenties.  I will scold them if they use the word “only” in conjunction with any sum of money greater than four dollars. The report’s author Alan Cole has perhaps perpetrated an epic oxymoron with his “only … $10.14 trillion”.

It Gets Worse

The report notes that its estimate does not include increases in the deficit due to additional spending on interest on the national debt.  It also does not consider the macroeconomic effects of any spending cuts that might be required in light of the much lower federal revenue.

The Benefits

It is hardly shocking that the across the board benefits of the massive tax cut are concentrated in the upper income range.

Taxpayers in the bottom deciles (the 0-10 and 10-20 percent deciles), would see increases in after-tax adjusted gross income (AGI) of 1.4 and 0.6 percent, respectively. Middle-income taxpayers with incomes that fall within the 30th to 80th percentiles would see larger increases in their after-tax AGI, of between 3.0 and 8.3 percent. Taxpayers with incomes that fall in the highest income class (the 90-100 percent decile) would see an increase in after-tax income of 14.6 percent. The top 1 percent of all taxpayers would see a 21.6 percent increase in after-tax income.

Randall Lane has just written a story about the way Donald Trump tends to challenge Forbes on its estimates of his net worth.  It will be interesting to see what Trump has to say about the Tax Foundation.