1lookingforthegoodwar
1jesusandjohnwayne
Tad Friend 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
11albion
2trap
8albion'
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
299
1empireofpain
13albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
2albion
12albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
3theleastofus
LillianFaderman
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1lafayette
199
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1defense
2lookingforthegoodwar
2theleastofus
storyparadox3
1madoff
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
3paradise
2defense
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
9albion
2transadentilist
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
3defense
storyparadox2
2confidencegames
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1gucci
1theleasofus
7albion
1paradide
3confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
George F Wil...360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
1confidencegames
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
4confidencegames
2gucci
7confidencegames
399
2falsewitness
4albion
Storyparadox1
3albion
1albion
10abion
2jesusandjohnwayne
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
5confidencegames
1trap
1lauber
1transcendentalist
Richard Posner 360x1000
6confidencegames
11632
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
5albion
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
499
14albion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2paradise
1falsewitness
2lafayette
lifeinmiddlemarch1
6albion

This was originally published on PAOO June 27, 2010.

Gratisography at Pexels

There are quite a few developments in the last few months I am hoping to spout about, but I am going to skip straight to PLR 201024005. The situation is not a common one, but it is a good starting point for a discussion of the tax aspects of divorce. The taxpayer held securities that were qualified replacement property from the sale of stock to an ESOP. The requested ruling, which is favorable, holds that the transfer of the securities to the taxpayer’s spouse will not trigger gain recognition 

All well and good. The question that intrigues me is whether taxpayer’s spouse knows the implications of the settlement. In my fantasy spouse will turn the securities over to a money manager who will sell them all and end up being shocked with the resulting tax bill. There used to be a joke that there are three ways to get out of a burned-out tax shelter. The first was to put the interest into a defective grantor trust and then cure the defect. It was a really neat idea. It doesn’t actually work, but it was clever. Then there was dying. Pretty drastic, but it worked (until this year anyway). Finally, there is giving it to your spouse and getting a divorce. Still works.

The important thing to remember is that property received in a divorce has the same basis that it had to the couple. So if one spouse gets a pile of money and the other spouse gets a pile of low basis assets of equal gross value, there really hasn’t been an even split. If the couple has significant assets, this could be a much more important issue than who gets the dependency deduction. The dependency deduction seems to garner much more attention than it is worth. Ironically, despite all the attention it is not unusual to neglect to follow through on the requirement that non-custodial parents obtain a release form.

Filing joint returns, in my experience, seems to usually be taken as a given. In situations where you have reason to believe that your spouse has unreported income or even when they have a high exposure return, the smart thing could be to forgo some savings in the interest of peace of mind.

Finally, if alimony is involved you need to be aware that there are fairly complex rules to prevent alimony treatment for payments that are more in the nature of property settlement or child support.