Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1gucci
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
2transadentilist
1lafayette
11albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
3theleastofus
1falsewitness
3albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2albion
6albion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
199
1paradide
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
13albion
14albion
1albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
6confidencegames
4confidencegames
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
3paradise
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
399
lifeinmiddlemarch1
3defense
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
2paradise
George F Wil...360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1transcendentalist
1empireofpain
Betty Friedan 360x1000
1lauber
2gucci
299
1madoff
Richard Posner 360x1000
2falsewitness
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
Tad Friend 360x1000
4albion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
7albion
5albion
8albion'
Gilgamesh 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
5confidencegames
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3confidencegames
1jesusandjohnwayne
499
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
storyparadox3
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
7confidencegames
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
storyparadox2
2theleastofus
2lookingforthegoodwar
2defense
2lafayette
11632
10abion
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
1trap
1theleasofus
9albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2trap
12albion
1defense
Maria Popova 360x1000
Storyparadox1
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1confidencegames
2confidencegames

This was originally published on PAOO June 27, 2010.

Gratisography at Pexels

There are quite a few developments in the last few months I am hoping to spout about, but I am going to skip straight to PLR 201024005. The situation is not a common one, but it is a good starting point for a discussion of the tax aspects of divorce. The taxpayer held securities that were qualified replacement property from the sale of stock to an ESOP. The requested ruling, which is favorable, holds that the transfer of the securities to the taxpayer’s spouse will not trigger gain recognition 

All well and good. The question that intrigues me is whether taxpayer’s spouse knows the implications of the settlement. In my fantasy spouse will turn the securities over to a money manager who will sell them all and end up being shocked with the resulting tax bill. There used to be a joke that there are three ways to get out of a burned-out tax shelter. The first was to put the interest into a defective grantor trust and then cure the defect. It was a really neat idea. It doesn’t actually work, but it was clever. Then there was dying. Pretty drastic, but it worked (until this year anyway). Finally, there is giving it to your spouse and getting a divorce. Still works.

The important thing to remember is that property received in a divorce has the same basis that it had to the couple. So if one spouse gets a pile of money and the other spouse gets a pile of low basis assets of equal gross value, there really hasn’t been an even split. If the couple has significant assets, this could be a much more important issue than who gets the dependency deduction. The dependency deduction seems to garner much more attention than it is worth. Ironically, despite all the attention it is not unusual to neglect to follow through on the requirement that non-custodial parents obtain a release form.

Filing joint returns, in my experience, seems to usually be taken as a given. In situations where you have reason to believe that your spouse has unreported income or even when they have a high exposure return, the smart thing could be to forgo some savings in the interest of peace of mind.

Finally, if alimony is involved you need to be aware that there are fairly complex rules to prevent alimony treatment for payments that are more in the nature of property settlement or child support.