1trap
2gucci
2albion
2trap
1confidencegames
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2falsewitness
Learned Hand 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
2confidencegames
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
6confidencegames
storyparadox3
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1transcendentalist
2transadentilist
10abion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
5albion
7confidencegames
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2lafayette
3paradise
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
6albion
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
1empireofpain
1madoff
299
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
11albion
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1lauber
2defense
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
2jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2theleastofus
1paradide
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
3confidencegames
storyparadox2
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
4albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
199
Edmund Burke 360x1000
499
13albion
5confidencegames
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
11632
14albion
LillianFaderman
8albion'
Storyparadox1
7albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
1gucci
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
3defense
1lafayette
1falsewitness
1theleasofus
1defense
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
9albion
1albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
4confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
2paradise
3albion
12albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
3theleastofus
399

This was originally published on PAOO June 27, 2010.

Gratisography at Pexels

There are quite a few developments in the last few months I am hoping to spout about, but I am going to skip straight to PLR 201024005. The situation is not a common one, but it is a good starting point for a discussion of the tax aspects of divorce. The taxpayer held securities that were qualified replacement property from the sale of stock to an ESOP. The requested ruling, which is favorable, holds that the transfer of the securities to the taxpayer’s spouse will not trigger gain recognition 

All well and good. The question that intrigues me is whether taxpayer’s spouse knows the implications of the settlement. In my fantasy spouse will turn the securities over to a money manager who will sell them all and end up being shocked with the resulting tax bill. There used to be a joke that there are three ways to get out of a burned-out tax shelter. The first was to put the interest into a defective grantor trust and then cure the defect. It was a really neat idea. It doesn’t actually work, but it was clever. Then there was dying. Pretty drastic, but it worked (until this year anyway). Finally, there is giving it to your spouse and getting a divorce. Still works.

The important thing to remember is that property received in a divorce has the same basis that it had to the couple. So if one spouse gets a pile of money and the other spouse gets a pile of low basis assets of equal gross value, there really hasn’t been an even split. If the couple has significant assets, this could be a much more important issue than who gets the dependency deduction. The dependency deduction seems to garner much more attention than it is worth. Ironically, despite all the attention it is not unusual to neglect to follow through on the requirement that non-custodial parents obtain a release form.

Filing joint returns, in my experience, seems to usually be taken as a given. In situations where you have reason to believe that your spouse has unreported income or even when they have a high exposure return, the smart thing could be to forgo some savings in the interest of peace of mind.

Finally, if alimony is involved you need to be aware that there are fairly complex rules to prevent alimony treatment for payments that are more in the nature of property settlement or child support.