9albion
2paradise
2theleastofus
7albion
8albion'
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
2falsewitness
499
George F Wil...360x1000
7confidencegames
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1trap
1falsewitness
1empireofpain
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
2trap
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
4confidencegames
1paradide
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
11albion
12albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
5albion
2defense
4albion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
3theleastofus
3paradise
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
1transcendentalist
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
6confidencegames
AlexRosenberg
3confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2lafayette
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2confidencegames
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
299
1defense
2gucci
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1confidencegames
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
3albion
Learned Hand 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
1lauber
Storyparadox1
storyparadox2
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
LillianFaderman
11632
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
13albion
3defense
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1lafayette
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1theleasofus
2transadentilist
1madoff
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
storyparadox3
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
1gucci
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
399
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
5confidencegames
1albion
14albion
6albion
199
2albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
10abion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000

Originally published on Passive Activities and Other Oxymorons on March 17th, 2011.
____________________________________________________________________________
So one rule that I have for the blog is to not comment on tax policy.  The PAOO Prime Directive is “It is what it is. Deal with it.”  I violate the rule about as often as Captain Kirk used to violate the Federation’s Prime Directive, roughly every other week or so.  Here is a new rule.  If somebody asks me nicely to write about something in my blog, I will, particularly if they ask me nicely twice.  I’ve decided that this rule overrides the Prime Directive.  Let’s call it the Super Prime Directive.

So here is the very nice email I just received:

Hello Peter

I sent you an email last week and didn’t hear back so I wanted to follow up. Congress and the Administration are looking into scaling back or eliminating the Mortgage Interest Deduction. The consequences would be devastating to the recovering housing market and the tens of millions of home owners who benefit from the deduction.
The House recently introduced a resolution to retain the mortgage interest deduction and I hope that you’ll help spread awareness about it on Passive Activities and Other Oxymorons. We created http://SaveMyMID.org to support this initiative and I’ve also created a useful site for bloggers and journalists to borrow resources from:
http://savemymid.info


Please let me know if you have any questions or need more information. If you are able to post about this, I’d love to get the link and share it with my team.


Thank you,
Ruth–


Ruth Potter

Ruth@SaveMyMID.info

You should check out the website.  It has some really nice pictures and is very well done.  The gist of the site is in the text over a picture of a lovely home with an American flag on it:

The mortgage interest deduction is at risk of being terminated.  The consequences would be devastating to home owners, the housing market and the nation’s economy.

Being self absorbed and also because it was easy, I recomputed my 2009 tax return without the home mortgage deduction.  It would have cost me $2,075.  I’ll call it forty bucks a week to be accurate, but not precise.  I suppose I could stop buying Mountain Dew and a chocolate frosted donut every morning.  Most likely though, it would mean my kids will inherit a little less or that I will run out of money when I am 94 instead of 96.  Then I tried to think how bad could it possibly be for somebody else.  Because of the limitation on the balance of a mortgage that can create a deduction you are not going to see many mortgage interest deductions north of $50,000.  To keep the math simple I’m going to say losing that deduction might cost somebody $20,000.  Now that’s a lot of money.  Of course I have a hard time with the idea of spending more than $1,000,000 on a house.  If the deduction is going to make the difference maybe you should be shopping for a starter home in the $500,000 range.  I know.  It’s easy for me to say not living in Silicon Valley.

I’m sorry that given that someone has nicely asked me to write about something that I can’t quite share their passion.  Check out their website and see what you think though.  And if you want me to write about something all you have to do is ask.  Agreeing with you will cost extra.