Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
8albion'
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
6confidencegames
12albion
2lookingforthegoodwar
10abion
6albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1defense
1paradide
3confidencegames
11632
2defense
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1trap
3paradise
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2falsewitness
7confidencegames
lifeinmiddlemarch1
13albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
199
2gucci
3albion
2transadentilist
2paradise
3defense
14albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
2albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
399
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1albion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
storyparadox3
4albion
3theleastofus
AlexRosenberg
299
4confidencegames
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
1falsewitness
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
5albion
11albion
5confidencegames
1lookingforthegoodwar
2trap
499
2theleastofus
1lauber
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
9albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1madoff
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
2lafayette
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
1empireofpain
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
LillianFaderman
1jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1confidencegames
1gucci
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
storyparadox2
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1transcendentalist
7albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
2confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Storyparadox1
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1theleasofus

Originally published on Passive Activities and Other Oxymorons on April 6th, 2011.
____________________________________________________________________________
David D. Robison, Sr., et ux. v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2011-59

Every man thinks meanly of himself for not having been a soldier, or not having been at sea.
Samuel Johnson

I promise to swear off that Samuel Johnson quotation for a while.  It seems so apt, here, though.  Perhaps it accounts for the great pride that Marines seem to have in their service and the general esteem in which they are held.  If being a soldier or going to sea suffices to not think meanly of yourself, then what must the effect be of being a sea going soldier ?  Mainly this story is about why I don’t have the right attitude to be a Tax Court judge.  Never mind that I’m lacking in numerous other qualifications.

So here is the story:

Petitioner David Daniel Robison, Sr. (hereinafter petitioner), served in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1966 until 1972. From December 1966 until February 1968 he served in Vietnam, where he sustained a variety of combat-related injuries. He spent a year in the hospital and was later discharged from the Marine Corps because of his injuries.

 Petitioner worked for the U.S. Postal Service from 1980 until he was forced to retire in 1992 as a result of the injuries he had sustained while serving in Vietnam. During the years since he was forced to retire, petitioner has received a retirement annuity from OPM. During some of those years, petitioners excluded the amount of that annuity from their gross income. Respondent examined petitioners’ returns for several of the years before the year in issue, and each time, respondent issued a closing letter accepting petitioners’ return as filed.

There have been a couple of times where I’ve thought about applying to work for the IRS.  There’s a lot of reasons I haven’t.  It’s not just because I’m too old for the really cool jobs, where you have a gun. What would I do if I was the revenue agent who was assigned to audit Mr. Robison, who quite reasonably believes that the lousy 14 grand he gets from the Post Office because he couldn’t work anymore due to his war wounds acting up should be excludible ?  I don’t know.  I can’t knock the agents and supervisors who kind of let it slide by.  Eventually though he must have caught an agent who not only didn’t remember the Vietnam War, but hadn’t even been born then and felt compelled to research the basis for Mr. Robison’s exclusion and found that there wasn’t one as the Tax Court confirmed:

In Haar v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 864 (1982), affd. 709 F.2d 1206 (8th Cir. 1983), this Court first addressed the question of whether an individual who retires from a civilian job because of a disability resulting from military service and receives disability payments from that civilian employer may exclude those payments from his gross income.   ……………….. We held that, because the disability payments the taxpayer received were not paid as compensation for personal injuries or sickness incurred in military service, the taxpayer was not entitled to exclude the disability payments under section 104(a)(4).

Mr. Robison did have another argument:

Petitioner also contends that, because respondent issued closing letters and accepted petitioners’ returns as filed in previous years, respondent should be barred from determining a deficiency for petitioners’ 2006 tax year.

It just doesn’t work that way.  Much as they would have liked to, the previous agents who slid this buy didn’t have the autority to amend the Code to put in a David Robison exception :

However, we have held that where the Commissioner has overlooked the taxability of certain items in previous years, he is not barred from taking a different position in later years.

It’s really too bad. If I’d been the Tax Court judge I would have been definitely trying to figure out a way to throw the case Mr. Robison’s way.  Instead he got:


In reaching these holdings, we have considered all the parties’ arguments, and, to the extent not addressed herein, we conclude that they are moot, irrelevant, or without merit.

He can’t work because he was wounded in Vietnam.  That might be moot and irrelevant to his post office pension being excludible, but don’t say “without merit”.