399
LillianFaderman
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1theleasofus
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
5albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
13albion
Learned Hand 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
2theleastofus
1paradide
2defense
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
4albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
299
3theleastofus
14albion
10abion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
2gucci
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
7confidencegames
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Richard Posner 360x1000
8albion'
4confidencegames
1defense
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1madoff
2falsewitness
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
11632
2lookingforthegoodwar
2lafayette
1gucci
1lookingforthegoodwar
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
3defense
3albion
499
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
11albion
2confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
storyparadox3
1empireofpain
storyparadox2
3confidencegames
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
1lauber
1trap
6confidencegames
2albion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
9albion
1falsewitness
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
6albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2trap
Storyparadox1
199
1transcendentalist
12albion
George F Wil...360x1000
2transadentilist
Edmund Burke 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
7albion
3paradise
1lafayette
1jesusandjohnwayne
2paradise
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
1confidencegames
Maria Popova 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
5confidencegames

Originally published on Forbes.com July 31st, 2013
If you are in North Carolina and have a zapper you better unload it before December.  After that, if you are caught with one you could be guilty of a Class H felony and subject to a fine of up to $10,000.  The more formal name for a zapper is “automated sales suppression device”.  That made me picture a really obnoxious robot that insults potential customers.  That’s not it.  A zapper does not suppress sales.  It suppresses the record of sales.  The definition in the North Carolina statute is:

A software program that falsifies the electronic records of electronic cash registers and other point-of-sale systems, including transaction data and transaction reports. The term includes the software program, any device that carries the software program, or an Internet link to the software program.

In the good old days of mechanical cash registers, I have heard that people would sometimes hit a subtotal on the day’s tape (Called X-out) to have a tape that matched the days deposit.  They would X-out a couple of hours before closing and only Z-out (which resets the mechanical totals), when they actually closed.
Zapper technology is much fancier.  According to this story in the New York Times

The more sophisticated zappers are easy to use, according to several experts. A dialogue box, which shows the day’s tally, pops up on the register’s screen.
In a second dialogue box, the thief chooses to take a dollar amount or percentage of the till. The program then calculates which orders to erase to get close to the amount of cash the person wants to remove. Then it suggests how much cash to take, and it erases the entries from the books and a corresponding amount in orders, so the register balances.

The Fight Against Zappers
Apparently North Carolina is not exactly leading the pack with this legislation.  According to this paper by Richard Ainsworth:

Georgia is the first state to take action. On May 3, 2011 Georgia enacted H.B. 415, which added code section 16-9-62 to Georgia statutes. This law made it illegal to willfully and knowingly sell, purchase, install, transfer, or possess any automated sales suppression device, zapper or phantom-ware in the state.  Prior to this date only the actual fraud was penalized; now the technology that facilitates the fraud is subject to enforcement measures. Before Georgia, no state penalized fraud-facilitating technology.

Mr. Ainsworth’s paper looks at what other countries are doing in response to zappers.  There is a regulatory approach that requires manufacturers to produce cash registers that are zapper proof.  Mr. Ainsworth questions whether this would work in the United States.
Where Do You Get a Zapper ?
Of all the ways that you can come up with to avoid taxes, skimming is my least favorite.  Unlike questionable deductions it is just in your face blatantly wrong.  My research on the topic was not that deep, so I was unable to discover where you can buy this nifty software.
My friend James once told me about a client he turned down who had been trapped into skimming.  He borrowed the money for his business from some folks from “the old country” who did not want any 1099-INT.  He also felt obligated to employ cousins from “the old country” in his operation.
The cousins not having green cards could not be getting W-2s.  Of course all that skimming to pay wages and interest is going to throw your cost of sales out of whack, so he needed to skim some more to buy some of his product with cash.  James figured that the guy was probably overpaying his own income taxes.  Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
Somebody enchanted with the idea of zapping might want to reflect on the fact that they are loading software into their POS system that has not been created by a legitimate vendor.  I wouldn’t be shocked to discover that there is zapping software that has additional features – like collecting credit card numbers and transmitting them to well – “the old country”.
You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.