2jesusandjohnwayne
1lafayette
2trap
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
1madoff
3albion
499
2gucci
12albion
11632
2albion
1paradide
lifeinmiddlemarch2
9albion
2paradise
1trap
1transcendentalist
1falsewitness
199
5albion
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
299
1theleasofus
AlexRosenberg
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
3theleastofus
1albion
Storyparadox1
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
7confidencegames
George F Wil...360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
1lauber
2lookingforthegoodwar
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
11albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
5confidencegames
13albion
2defense
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
3paradise
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
1empireofpain
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2confidencegames
1gucci
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
storyparadox2
1defense
399
3defense
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
6albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
2falsewitness
storyparadox3
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
2transadentilist
10abion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
2lafayette
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
3confidencegames
8albion'
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
4albion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1confidencegames
4confidencegames
Betty Friedan 360x1000
14albion
7albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2theleastofus
Maria Popova 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
6confidencegames

Imgage by Grok

Milk Saving Starving Children Foundation

I kid you not.  Milk Saving Starving Children Foundation (MSSCF) was an actual organization. It filed a 990-N for several years.  I asked Grok to create an image for it. I am skeptical about the 600 glasses of milk statistic, but so it goes.  Somebody would have to be drinking a lot of milk to make up for me.

Anyway, MSSCF has the distinction of getting the first Tax Court memorandum opinion of 2026.  It is TC Memo 2026-1.

The IRS revoked MSSCF’s exempt status with a final adverse determination dated February 25, 2022.  MSSCF filed a petition to the Tax Court on May 26, 2022 – timely, although cutting it really close. IRS filed a motion for summary judgment.  Special Trial Judge Diana Leyden took MSSCF’s response as a request for more time, which was granted.  When the new deadline passed without further response, Judge Leyden granted the IRS motion.

Here are some of the high points.  When MSSCF applied for exempt status in 2001, it described its planned activities as:

“The Milk Saving Starving Children Foundation will raise money to purchase rice, soy, and/or powdered milk. It will solicit these products from their manufacturers. The milk will then be distributed world-wide to starving children.”

In 2001 the board decided to purchase and renovate a building.  They opened a coffee shop known as Cafe Beignet there in 2003.  There was an addition to the building in 2009.  The property was rented to various tenants including two pizza shops and an Indian restaurant.

On the milk front, there was $159.60 worth sent to Haiti  and Ecuador in 2001.  There was some discussion in 2008 about local milk shipments.  Milk donations of $1,100 were indicated on the 2008 return.  In 2011, powdered milk donations ceased.  They started back up in 2020 when the audit was underway.  Annual golf fundraisers started in 2010, but it is unclear where the raised funds went.

“The IRS found that petitioner’s primary activity was operating a coffee shop, Café Beignet, and petitioner’s primary sources of revenue were from renting the Property and its addition, as well as its golf fundraiser. The IRS concluded that the funds raised by the above activities were not used for charitable purposes, as demonstrated by petitioner’s tax returns and financial documentation.”

It is possible that there is another side to this story and Kimberly Orazzi, one of the officers, just gave up or misunderstood the Tax Court’s directions. In order to defeat summary judgment, there needed to be something offered that indicated there were “genuine issues of material fact”.

An intriguing question that I am not looking into is whether the building was considered exempt from property tax.

Other Coverage

Paul Streckfus covered the opinion in the EO Tax Journal (2026-4 – January 7, 2026). Steckfus found the result in favor of the IRS unsurprising, but was wondering why the IRS had three of its top attorneys on the case.  He also noted that the opinion reaffirmed the Better Business Bureau opinion that held that a single non-exempt purpose precludes exempt status regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes”.

Lew Taishoff also covered the case in Milking The Exemption.

What This Brought To Mind

One of my personal jokes was thinking about going over to the dark side and starting a dubious charity.  What would I call it?  I was thinking that it would be a charity that provided veterinary care to the dogs of children of veterans with cancer.  Grok came up with so many great images for that, that it is really hard to pick one, but here is an example:

 

A photograph of a veterinary clinic caring for dogs of veterans' children with cancer, showing compassion and support.

I think my effort to check numerous boxes might have been a little overboard.  Milk for starving children would probably work better and, as it happens, there actually was some milk involved in all this, just not all that much apparently.


You can find my most practical advice along with a lot of other great stuff at Think Outside The Tax Box.

For great value in continuing professional education check out the Boston Tax Institute.

If you would like to do some business with Your Tax Matters Partner email

yourtaxmatterspartner@gmail.com

and type Business on the subject line. I am open to all sorts of things – consulting for you, advertising on this site, accepting an uncompensated guest post, selling some or all of the content that is here are the examples that come to mind.

I am not interested at all in anything that requires me to spend money. Any such communications risk being mocked in a future blog post.