Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
8albion'
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
1paradide
199
13albion
12albion
2defense
George F Wil...360x1000
1trap
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2albion
1confidencegames
1defense
11632
2paradise
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
4albion
399
Maria Popova 360x1000
1gucci
storyparadox3
5albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
2falsewitness
3defense
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
3albion
1madoff
1lookingforthegoodwar
2lafayette
7albion
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1albion
3paradise
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
5confidencegames
1lauber
299
1transcendentalist
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
2confidencegames
2lookingforthegoodwar
Richard Posner 360x1000
3confidencegames
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
499
1empireofpain
4confidencegames
2jesusandjohnwayne
2theleastofus
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
7confidencegames
2gucci
1theleasofus
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
9albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
1lafayette
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
3theleastofus
2transadentilist
6confidencegames
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2trap
LillianFaderman
Learned Hand 360x1000
storyparadox2
Storyparadox1
Tad Friend 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
10abion
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
6albion
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
14albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
11albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Doctor Dino’s Lawsuit Against Mark Stoney A Revised Complaint

Doctor Dino’s Lawsuit Against Mark Stoney A Revised Complaint

Defamation/malicious prosecution claims have merit if malice proven, but speech defenses often prevail in similar critic-vs-public-figure cases (e.g., celebrity defamation suits dismissed). Could survive motion to dismiss (complaint detailed), but summary judgment likely if discovery shows Stoney’s good faith.

read more
Scholar Al Strikes At Dixieland Boondockery Again

Scholar Al Strikes At Dixieland Boondockery Again

So IRS wanted to give them zero, Judge Lauber allowed them in my mind a substantial deduction well over $150,000. On a percentage basis, it is not so much – slightly over 0.15%.  Just to be clear that is not 15% of the total claimed. It is 15% of 1% of the total claimed.  I am pretty sure that is as low as it has gone without going to zero.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.