lifeinmiddlemarch2
1gucci
1madoff
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
1theleasofus
2transadentilist
2jesusandjohnwayne
2gucci
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2confidencegames
1lookingforthegoodwar
199
storyparadox3
storyparadox2
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
12albion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2defense
399
2trap
3confidencegames
1confidencegames
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
6albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
14albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
10abion
1albion
499
1trap
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1empireofpain
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2lafayette
5confidencegames
George F Wil...360x1000
8albion'
2albion
11632
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1lafayette
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
13albion
2paradise
3theleastofus
1transcendentalist
Learned Hand 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2theleastofus
7confidencegames
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2lookingforthegoodwar
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
3defense
Richard Posner 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
5albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
299
AlexRosenberg
11albion
1defense
4albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1lauber
7albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1paradide
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
3paradise
9albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
6confidencegames
4confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
2falsewitness
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
3albion
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Storyparadox1
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.