storyparadox2
1defense
1madoff
5albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
3defense
Richard Posner 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
2trap
lifeinmiddlemarch1
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
10abion
2falsewitness
storyparadox3
George F Wil...360x1000
2confidencegames
1lafayette
AlexRosenberg
2transadentilist
3confidencegames
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
7confidencegames
2defense
1jesusandjohnwayne
1albion
3albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
399
2lookingforthegoodwar
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1paradide
2paradise
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
199
8albion'
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
13albion
11632
2lafayette
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1confidencegames
Maria Popova 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
9albion
1trap
5confidencegames
2theleastofus
Learned Hand 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1lauber
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
4confidencegames
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Storyparadox1
1empireofpain
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
11albion
2albion
4albion
6confidencegames
3paradise
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2gucci
7albion
1theleasofus
499
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1transcendentalist
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
1falsewitness
12albion
299
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
6albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1gucci
14albion

Paycheck Protection Certification – No Harm No Foul

Basically nobody who had an actual business and did not blatantly lie on the application will have cause to regret having chased PPP money. Given the speed which the program was thrown together and the vagueness of the certification, this is clearly the right answer.

If there was an attempt to penalize companies because they were being piggy in applying, litigation would have dragged on for years. I might have found it entertaining, but no good would have come of it.

read more

Trump Abandons Dock Dispute But State Income Tax Exposure Remains

But the matters uncovered in the dock dispute, raise a big red flag on the effectiveness of President Trump’s switch. There was a contract uncovered that indicated that he could not use Mar-a-Lago as a residence-that he could not stay there more than three non-consecutive seven day periods just like any other member of the club.

And that brings us to the question of domicile. It is possible that more than one state can tax you as a resident based on how much time you spend there and some other factors (It’s called the New York rule), but you will almost inevitably be taxed as a resident in your state of domicile even in years when you spend no time at all there.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.