Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
7albion
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1lauber
8albion'
storyparadox3
1transcendentalist
Richard Posner 360x1000
2albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
399
Storyparadox1
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
7confidencegames
4albion
3paradise
199
AlexRosenberg
11632
2paradise
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
3theleastofus
2lafayette
LillianFaderman
4confidencegames
1lafayette
6albion
3defense
2gucci
1lookingforthegoodwar
1trap
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1confidencegames
1falsewitness
11albion
George F Wil...360x1000
14albion
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2confidencegames
1empireofpain
2trap
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
3albion
6confidencegames
5albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2theleastofus
1albion
2defense
12albion
storyparadox2
5confidencegames
1paradide
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
3confidencegames
2transadentilist
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
10abion
499
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2falsewitness
Learned Hand 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
9albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1madoff
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
13albion
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
299
1gucci
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1defense
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1theleasofus
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2jesusandjohnwayne

Paycheck Protection Certification – No Harm No Foul

Basically nobody who had an actual business and did not blatantly lie on the application will have cause to regret having chased PPP money. Given the speed which the program was thrown together and the vagueness of the certification, this is clearly the right answer.

If there was an attempt to penalize companies because they were being piggy in applying, litigation would have dragged on for years. I might have found it entertaining, but no good would have come of it.

read more

Trump Abandons Dock Dispute But State Income Tax Exposure Remains

But the matters uncovered in the dock dispute, raise a big red flag on the effectiveness of President Trump’s switch. There was a contract uncovered that indicated that he could not use Mar-a-Lago as a residence-that he could not stay there more than three non-consecutive seven day periods just like any other member of the club.

And that brings us to the question of domicile. It is possible that more than one state can tax you as a resident based on how much time you spend there and some other factors (It’s called the New York rule), but you will almost inevitably be taxed as a resident in your state of domicile even in years when you spend no time at all there.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.