299
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
11632
1madoff
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1lafayette
399
2falsewitness
AlexRosenberg
1gucci
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
7albion
George F Wil...360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
storyparadox3
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1lauber
5albion
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
2trap
2transadentilist
Learned Hand 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
13albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
199
12albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2paradise
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Richard Posner 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
storyparadox2
Storyparadox1
2albion
1falsewitness
1paradide
7confidencegames
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
3defense
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
3confidencegames
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
2theleastofus
2confidencegames
10abion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1transcendentalist
lifeinmiddlemarch2
3paradise
3theleastofus
499
1theleasofus
14albion
4confidencegames
2lookingforthegoodwar
2gucci
2jesusandjohnwayne
4albion
1trap
1confidencegames
6albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2defense
3albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
8albion'
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1albion
5confidencegames
2lafayette
9albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
1defense
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
6confidencegames
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
11albion
1empireofpain

Paycheck Protection Certification – No Harm No Foul

Basically nobody who had an actual business and did not blatantly lie on the application will have cause to regret having chased PPP money. Given the speed which the program was thrown together and the vagueness of the certification, this is clearly the right answer.

If there was an attempt to penalize companies because they were being piggy in applying, litigation would have dragged on for years. I might have found it entertaining, but no good would have come of it.

read more

Trump Abandons Dock Dispute But State Income Tax Exposure Remains

But the matters uncovered in the dock dispute, raise a big red flag on the effectiveness of President Trump’s switch. There was a contract uncovered that indicated that he could not use Mar-a-Lago as a residence-that he could not stay there more than three non-consecutive seven day periods just like any other member of the club.

And that brings us to the question of domicile. It is possible that more than one state can tax you as a resident based on how much time you spend there and some other factors (It’s called the New York rule), but you will almost inevitably be taxed as a resident in your state of domicile even in years when you spend no time at all there.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.