Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2confidencegames
Tad Friend 360x1000
399
7confidencegames
11albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2transadentilist
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
499
1albion
2lafayette
12albion
Storyparadox1
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
2falsewitness
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Richard Posner 360x1000
5albion
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
4confidencegames
2paradise
1empireofpain
3albion
1lafayette
299
1madoff
1paradide
2gucci
10abion
2albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
4albion
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
6confidencegames
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
199
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
14albion
Betty Friedan 360x1000
3confidencegames
1lauber
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
3defense
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
3theleastofus
1theleasofus
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
2defense
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
1trap
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2theleastofus
5confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1transcendentalist
2jesusandjohnwayne
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1defense
6albion
1gucci
lifeinmiddlemarch2
11632
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
8albion'
1lookingforthegoodwar
1confidencegames
13albion
9albion
storyparadox3
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
storyparadox2
3paradise
7albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
2trap
Maria Popova 360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.