14albion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
7albion
3theleastofus
299
1lafayette
1lauber
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
13albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
2confidencegames
499
7confidencegames
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1defense
1madoff
2lafayette
storyparadox3
1lookingforthegoodwar
11albion
4confidencegames
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
2defense
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2paradise
9albion
1empireofpain
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1confidencegames
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Storyparadox1
2gucci
2trap
1gucci
10abion
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
6albion
Richard Posner 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
storyparadox2
3defense
3paradise
2transadentilist
6confidencegames
1trap
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
2falsewitness
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
2theleastofus
5albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
4albion
3confidencegames
3albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
1transcendentalist
AlexRosenberg
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
399
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
11632
LillianFaderman
199
2jesusandjohnwayne
1albion
12albion
1theleasofus
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
8albion'
5confidencegames
1paradide
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Billionaire Bruins Owner Beats IRS On Tax Deductions For Away Game Meals

Billionaire Bruins Owner Beats IRS On Tax Deductions For Away Game Meals

Since the whole away team crew is away from its business home, the IRS does not question that the meals are deductible.  Generally, though, the deduction for meals is limited to 50% (Code Section 274(n)).  There are exceptions.  There were two that the Bruins owners argued they qualified for.  One was that the meals were a “de minimis” fringe benefit and the other was that they were an expense of entertainment sold to customers.  The first excuse turned out to be good enough, so the Tax Court did not discuss the second one.

It might seem odd, but a footnote indicates that the IRS was not proposing an adjustment with respect to meals provided to players and staff in TD Gardens in Boston, but that is the key to the controversy.

In order to qualify as de minimis fringe benefits the meals must be provided in  a non-discriminatory manner.  There did not seem to be any issue about that.  The more challenging requirement is that the meals be provided at a facility owned or leased by the employer located on or near the business premises of the employer.  That’s why there was no question about meals provided for home games

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.