Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2trap
3defense
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
2gucci
2confidencegames
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1madoff
1confidencegames
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2falsewitness
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
7confidencegames
storyparadox3
1theleasofus
1gucci
7albion
13albion
1transcendentalist
2lookingforthegoodwar
Learned Hand 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1paradide
1trap
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
9albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
2theleastofus
5albion
11632
12albion
3paradise
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
11albion
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
3theleastofus
1lookingforthegoodwar
1defense
Richard Posner 360x1000
3albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
8albion'
Betty Friedan 360x1000
499
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2defense
10abion
399
14albion
1lauber
4albion
5confidencegames
1empireofpain
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
6albion
299
Tad Friend 360x1000
199
3confidencegames
2transadentilist
4confidencegames
lifeinmiddlemarch2
6confidencegames
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1albion
storyparadox2
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Storyparadox1
2paradise
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
2lafayette
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.