2transadentilist
4albion
11632
1falsewitness
2falsewitness
6albion
9albion
Storyparadox1
2lafayette
2paradise
Betty Friedan 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1jesusandjohnwayne
199
499
Maria Popova 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
12albion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
3confidencegames
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1albion
1theleasofus
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2defense
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1lafayette
1empireofpain
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
2gucci
2jesusandjohnwayne
1gucci
7confidencegames
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
storyparadox3
3albion
1defense
14albion
2albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
6confidencegames
5confidencegames
1trap
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2theleastofus
399
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
2trap
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
3theleastofus
1paradide
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
5albion
3paradise
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
8albion'
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1lauber
1madoff
299
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
3defense
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
11albion
1confidencegames
storyparadox2
1transcendentalist
George F Wil...360x1000
10abion
7albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
13albion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
4confidencegames
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.