11632
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
399
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
4confidencegames
8albion'
2confidencegames
1falsewitness
1theleasofus
1albion
Richard Posner 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1trap
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
7albion
11albion
LillianFaderman
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
3defense
1transcendentalist
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2trap
Learned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
4albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
299
1madoff
1lookingforthegoodwar
2gucci
2albion
5confidencegames
199
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1empireofpain
1confidencegames
1paradide
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3confidencegames
2paradise
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
1lauber
lifeinmiddlemarch1
storyparadox3
1defense
3paradise
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
5albion
6confidencegames
2lafayette
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2transadentilist
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1gucci
Storyparadox1
7confidencegames
13albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
storyparadox2
12albion
10abion
1jesusandjohnwayne
3albion
2theleastofus
AlexRosenberg
2falsewitness
Maria Popova 360x1000
9albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
499
3theleastofus
6albion
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
14albion
2defense
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.