Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1empireofpain
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
3albion
14albion
2defense
1gucci
499
George F Wil...360x1000
11albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
1lafayette
1trap
7albion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
storyparadox2
299
2gucci
1transcendentalist
Richard Posner 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
3theleastofus
1defense
4albion
1albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1lauber
Storyparadox1
storyparadox3
lifeinmiddlemarch2
AlexRosenberg
Edmund Burke 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
2trap
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
7confidencegames
2transadentilist
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
10abion
9albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
1theleasofus
1lookingforthegoodwar
1paradide
1madoff
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2paradise
Tad Friend 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
399
4confidencegames
Gilgamesh 360x1000
12albion
2theleastofus
2lafayette
3defense
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
5albion
1falsewitness
2falsewitness
11632
3paradise
2lookingforthegoodwar
Learned Hand 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
13albion
6albion
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3confidencegames
8albion'
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
5confidencegames
1confidencegames
2confidencegames
Maria Popova 360x1000
199
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
6confidencegames
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.