Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Maria Popova 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
2falsewitness
499
3albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
3paradise
1paradide
1lauber
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1defense
2lookingforthegoodwar
Tad Friend 360x1000
Storyparadox1
8albion'
399
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1lafayette
14albion
2defense
2theleastofus
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1gucci
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
299
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
7confidencegames
2transadentilist
1falsewitness
1albion
2paradise
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
2lafayette
1theleasofus
12albion
2confidencegames
6albion
1madoff
3theleastofus
1confidencegames
storyparadox3
199
1transcendentalist
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2trap
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
5albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1empireofpain
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
11albion
9albion
10abion
storyparadox2
George F Wil...360x1000
7albion
AlexRosenberg
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1trap
2gucci
3defense
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2albion
5confidencegames
11632
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3confidencegames
4confidencegames
1lookingforthegoodwar
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
13albion
4albion
6confidencegames
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
Richard Posner 360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.