299
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
4confidencegames
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
2defense
3confidencegames
1madoff
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
7confidencegames
6confidencegames
2albion
3paradise
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Learned Hand 360x1000
2lafayette
13albion
AlexRosenberg
Maria Popova 360x1000
1defense
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
399
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
storyparadox2
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2paradise
2confidencegames
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
8albion'
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1empireofpain
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1confidencegames
3defense
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1paradide
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
2gucci
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
1trap
1theleasofus
Tad Friend 360x1000
5confidencegames
Betty Friedan 360x1000
1gucci
499
2theleastofus
Gilgamesh 360x1000
7albion
LillianFaderman
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
9albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
2lookingforthegoodwar
14albion
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
3albion
199
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Storyparadox1
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
10abion
12albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
4albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1lafayette
11632
1falsewitness
1lauber
3theleastofus
2trap
11albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
6albion
storyparadox3
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
5albion
1transcendentalist
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2transadentilist
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
2falsewitness
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.