3confidencegames
Storyparadox1
499
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2trap
Gilgamesh 360x1000
11albion
13albion
1defense
11632
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
5albion
2lafayette
2gucci
1madoff
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
3albion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
7albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
1lafayette
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
lifeinmiddlemarch2
1paradide
7confidencegames
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
10abion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
4albion
1transcendentalist
199
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
2defense
1empireofpain
6albion
2paradise
12albion
2albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
1gucci
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
4confidencegames
3defense
2confidencegames
2falsewitness
5confidencegames
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2theleastofus
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
1falsewitness
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
storyparadox2
lifeinmiddlemarch1
6confidencegames
1theleasofus
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
14albion
1albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
9albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
299
3theleastofus
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
LillianFaderman
2lookingforthegoodwar
399
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
8albion'
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
1lauber
1confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
storyparadox3
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
3paradise
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1trap
2transadentilist
Maria Popova 360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.