6confidencegames
Tad Friend 360x1000
3albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
storyparadox2
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1gucci
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2transadentilist
399
11632
11albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
1theleasofus
1empireofpain
2confidencegames
Gilgamesh 360x1000
5confidencegames
3paradise
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
4confidencegames
Richard Posner 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
8albion'
3confidencegames
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2albion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Storyparadox1
199
2jesusandjohnwayne
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
5albion
3defense
2trap
12albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
1transcendentalist
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1madoff
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1trap
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2paradise
2lafayette
2defense
Learned Hand 360x1000
1paradide
7albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1lafayette
3theleastofus
1albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
4albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
9albion
LillianFaderman
13albion
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
10abion
1confidencegames
1defense
Betty Friedan 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
7confidencegames
6albion
1lauber
14albion
2falsewitness
499
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
2gucci
299
2theleastofus
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
storyparadox3
1falsewitness
Home Schooling Contingency Does Not Kill Alimony Deduction

Home Schooling Contingency Does Not Kill Alimony Deduction

Petitioner and his former wife entered into the agreement that she would homeschool their child with the explicit understanding that their decision would cause financial hardship for her because she would not be able to work while performing the schooling. Under the terms of the written agreement and their understanding, it was solely within his former wife’s discretion as to whether she would go back to work or continue homeschooling their child. During the seventh month of the agreement under the divorce order, the former wife requested increased spousal support payments from petitioner, but he was unable or unwilling to pay more. Hence, petitioner’s former wife decided to return to work, and therefore the child was no longer homeschooled

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.