lifeinmiddlemarch2
George F Wil...360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1gucci
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1transcendentalist
2falsewitness
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
1madoff
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1falsewitness
7confidencegames
399
lifeinmiddlemarch1
11632
Richard Posner 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
storyparadox3
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
9albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
14albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2gucci
2paradise
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2theleastofus
4confidencegames
3defense
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
13albion
5albion
2confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
499
12albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
1lookingforthegoodwar
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
2transadentilist
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
3confidencegames
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Storyparadox1
6albion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
199
6confidencegames
1confidencegames
1lafayette
Learned Hand 360x1000
2lafayette
1defense
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1empireofpain
3paradise
7albion
2albion
LillianFaderman
8albion'
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
storyparadox2
1theleasofus
1albion
10abion
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
4albion
2defense
Maria Popova 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
11albion
2trap
3albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
5confidencegames
1trap
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
299
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
1paradide
1lauber
Home Schooling Contingency Does Not Kill Alimony Deduction

Home Schooling Contingency Does Not Kill Alimony Deduction

Petitioner and his former wife entered into the agreement that she would homeschool their child with the explicit understanding that their decision would cause financial hardship for her because she would not be able to work while performing the schooling. Under the terms of the written agreement and their understanding, it was solely within his former wife’s discretion as to whether she would go back to work or continue homeschooling their child. During the seventh month of the agreement under the divorce order, the former wife requested increased spousal support payments from petitioner, but he was unable or unwilling to pay more. Hence, petitioner’s former wife decided to return to work, and therefore the child was no longer homeschooled

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.