2theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
1confidencegames
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
storyparadox3
3confidencegames
3theleastofus
1paradide
3paradise
8albion'
LillianFaderman
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1defense
Learned Hand 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
6confidencegames
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
1lauber
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
3defense
storyparadox2
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
Storyparadox1
1empireofpain
1jesusandjohnwayne
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2confidencegames
11albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
399
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
10abion
3albion
2transadentilist
George F Wil...360x1000
2gucci
2lafayette
2defense
2lookingforthegoodwar
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1transcendentalist
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
6albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2albion
4confidencegames
199
14albion
1gucci
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
4albion
1trap
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
1theleasofus
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2trap
5albion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
7confidencegames
5confidencegames
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
7albion
12albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
2falsewitness
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1madoff
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
9albion
299
1falsewitness
1lafayette
1lookingforthegoodwar
2paradise
11632
AlexRosenberg
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
499
1albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
13albion
Home Schooling Contingency Does Not Kill Alimony Deduction

Home Schooling Contingency Does Not Kill Alimony Deduction

Petitioner and his former wife entered into the agreement that she would homeschool their child with the explicit understanding that their decision would cause financial hardship for her because she would not be able to work while performing the schooling. Under the terms of the written agreement and their understanding, it was solely within his former wife’s discretion as to whether she would go back to work or continue homeschooling their child. During the seventh month of the agreement under the divorce order, the former wife requested increased spousal support payments from petitioner, but he was unable or unwilling to pay more. Hence, petitioner’s former wife decided to return to work, and therefore the child was no longer homeschooled

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.