Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Richard Posner 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
12albion
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2lafayette
1paradide
3paradise
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
11632
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1trap
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
499
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1falsewitness
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
2paradise
2trap
4confidencegames
Gilgamesh 360x1000
9albion
Learned Hand 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
storyparadox3
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
3defense
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
199
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
1transcendentalist
8albion'
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1lauber
1lookingforthegoodwar
storyparadox2
1madoff
5confidencegames
13albion
14albion
2transadentilist
AlexRosenberg
1gucci
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2defense
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
1theleasofus
2gucci
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
10abion
11albion
2theleastofus
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
5albion
299
6albion
7albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Storyparadox1
399
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
6confidencegames
2confidencegames
3confidencegames
1albion
3theleastofus
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2albion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
1defense
1confidencegames
1empireofpain
2falsewitness
4albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
7confidencegames
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.