Stormy Daniels 360x1000
8albion'
1madoff
12albion
2trap
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2gucci
1lauber
2theleastofus
9albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
2defense
10abion
Learned Hand 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1lafayette
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
6albion
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1transcendentalist
3defense
George F Wil...360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
3paradise
7confidencegames
5confidencegames
Tad Friend 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1gucci
1falsewitness
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
13albion
1paradide
1confidencegames
1lookingforthegoodwar
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
storyparadox3
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
5albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2paradise
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
4confidencegames
2confidencegames
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
499
lifeinmiddlemarch1
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
2transadentilist
1defense
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1trap
11632
3confidencegames
3albion
299
Betty Friedan 360x1000
1empireofpain
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Storyparadox1
LillianFaderman
1albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
2albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
storyparadox2
2lafayette
4albion
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2falsewitness
1theleasofus
7albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
399
199
11albion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
14albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
6confidencegames
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.