lifeinmiddlemarch2
Tad Friend 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
1gucci
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
7albion
2defense
2gucci
AlexRosenberg
3paradise
1confidencegames
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1albion
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
499
1madoff
14albion
Richard Posner 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1trap
1lauber
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
4confidencegames
2transadentilist
5confidencegames
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
7confidencegames
Storyparadox1
2falsewitness
11albion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
6confidencegames
1theleasofus
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
12albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
storyparadox2
5albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
299
10abion
3theleastofus
1lafayette
1lookingforthegoodwar
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
8albion'
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1falsewitness
George F Wil...360x1000
2paradise
2lookingforthegoodwar
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
storyparadox3
1jesusandjohnwayne
9albion
2confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
3confidencegames
2trap
LillianFaderman
Maria Popova 360x1000
1paradide
2lafayette
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
3albion
3defense
2albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
399
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
6albion
1defense
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
4albion
Learned Hand 360x1000
199
1empireofpain
1transcendentalist
11632
13albion
2theleastofus
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.