Exclusive – Kent Hovind Claims Congressmen Are Looking Into His Case
The rumor is that the interview was going to be cut down to two minutes and run on CNN prompting a call for the entire interview to be posted. The latter was actually the plan all along and I never had any contact with CNN. With that said, I really would not mind if people started contacting CNN to ask when Pete Reilly’s Kent Hovind interview is going to run. What would be really cool would be to hear from my possible cousin Bill who is on Fox. He poached a clip from my Jill Stein interview without giving any credit to me or Interlock Media.
Like my Jill Stein interview, this inteview will also be cut down into a number of topically based shorter sequences. Also like my Jill Stein interview and the soon to be released interview with Ernie Land, it was professionally produced, although on a shoe string budget entirely funded by a notorious cheapskate. I’m the cheapskate, of course. The production is the work of documentary film maker Jonathan Schwartz of Interlock Media. Among his credits are Turned Out and Faith in the Big House so he is far from a jail house interview virgin. His current project concerns the feminist icon Margaret Fuller.
Bitter CPA Fight Good For Attorneys And Nobody Else
Mr. Waldman’s ex-partners won in district court – kind of. They were awarded the minimum which totaled $15,000. That is understandable, since getting a bad 1099 or W-2 will probably not do you much damage if you know what you are doing and the victims were CPAs. No award for attorneys fees, though. And I bet the fees came to more than 15 grand making for something of a Pyrrhic victory. Apparently they were not satisfied with the amount of wealth that had been transferred to the legal profession by the accounting profession. So they appealed. Mr. Waldman appealed also.
Follow Me
Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.