1transcendentalist
Richard Posner 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1albion
299
1paradide
2lookingforthegoodwar
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
storyparadox2
4confidencegames
1gucci
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
7albion
Storyparadox1
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
2paradise
2jesusandjohnwayne
Tad Friend 360x1000
1trap
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2gucci
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
3defense
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
11albion
storyparadox3
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
1lauber
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
13albion
2albion
6albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
2theleastofus
2falsewitness
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2defense
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
3paradise
1lookingforthegoodwar
10abion
6confidencegames
George F Wil...360x1000
1falsewitness
2confidencegames
3theleastofus
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1confidencegames
399
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
9albion
1defense
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2lafayette
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
7confidencegames
2transadentilist
AlexRosenberg
11632
499
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
5confidencegames
8albion'
199
1madoff
3albion
3confidencegames
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Learned Hand 360x1000
2trap
12albion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1empireofpain
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
5albion
4albion
14albion
1lafayette
1theleasofus
Facade Easement Valuation Cannot Be Percentage Rule Of Thumb

Facade Easement Valuation Cannot Be Percentage Rule Of Thumb

The approach that NAT ended up promoting was to use a percentage valuation that had been accepted in other cases.  If that had worked, it would have ended up being circular reasoning as each valuation in the 10% range would reinforce the notion that that was the correct valuation.  You could see why they would want to do it this way.  It made planning much easier.  Once tax advisors grasped the concept, they could easily see how it would apply to their clients.  Pay something like 1% of the value of your property to a group like NAT and you get a charitable deduction for 10% +/- of its value.  The thing that did not fully register with some people was that in order for the donation to be legitimate the value of your property should actually go down by 10%.

read more
Step Kids Remain Step Kids After Divorce

Step Kids Remain Step Kids After Divorce

Therefore, petitioner’s divorce did not terminate his stepparent-stepchild relationships with B.E. and H.A. Accordingly, they are petitioner’s stepchildren, thus satisfying the relationship test. We therefore hold that B.E. and H.A. are petitioner’s qualifying children for purposes of the dependency exemption deductions for 2011.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.