Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
1albion
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
storyparadox2
399
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1lauber
1transcendentalist
11albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
8albion'
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1falsewitness
2falsewitness
1madoff
1jesusandjohnwayne
3albion
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
7albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2paradise
1lafayette
499
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
7confidencegames
Tad Friend 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Storyparadox1
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
3confidencegames
2jesusandjohnwayne
2lookingforthegoodwar
4albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
3paradise
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
11632
storyparadox3
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2trap
Betty Friedan 360x1000
3defense
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
10abion
2albion
6albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
199
2gucci
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2transadentilist
299
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
5albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1defense
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
1trap
12albion
1paradide
LillianFaderman
4confidencegames
1empireofpain
5confidencegames
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
14albion
13albion
1confidencegames
Richard Posner 360x1000
6confidencegames
2theleastofus
2defense
lifeinmiddlemarch2
AlexRosenberg
2lafayette
1gucci
9albion
1theleasofus
2confidencegames
Graduation Contingency Kills Alimony Deduction

Graduation Contingency Kills Alimony Deduction

In this case, the divorce decree clearly states that the support payments will terminate upon the graduation of the youngest child. With this kind of contingency, the statute compels us to characterize the payments as child support.  The fact that the divorce decree specifies that the payments are to be deducted by Mr. Johnson is not controlling

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.