199
AlexRosenberg
Storyparadox1
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2defense
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
11albion
1lookingforthegoodwar
2paradise
2gucci
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1albion
Learned Hand 360x1000
2lafayette
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
1confidencegames
5albion
Richard Posner 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
7confidencegames
4confidencegames
399
1empireofpain
2confidencegames
George F Wil...360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
storyparadox3
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1paradide
Maria Popova 360x1000
1gucci
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1theleasofus
2theleastofus
299
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
1falsewitness
Gilgamesh 360x1000
3defense
1trap
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
12albion
14albion
3confidencegames
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
499
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
13albion
6albion
2trap
storyparadox2
9albion
1madoff
1transcendentalist
2albion
2transadentilist
1lafayette
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
3paradise
1lauber
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
3albion
1defense
2falsewitness
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
7albion
5confidencegames
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
10abion
Tad Friend 360x1000
11632
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
6confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
8albion'
1jesusandjohnwayne
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
4albion
Graduation Contingency Kills Alimony Deduction

Graduation Contingency Kills Alimony Deduction

In this case, the divorce decree clearly states that the support payments will terminate upon the graduation of the youngest child. With this kind of contingency, the statute compels us to characterize the payments as child support.  The fact that the divorce decree specifies that the payments are to be deducted by Mr. Johnson is not controlling

read more
Tax Court Denies Amway Losses – Again

Tax Court Denies Amway Losses – Again

My first suggestion is that if you want to have a side business to make personal expenses deductible (which is something that you should not do at all, by the way), Amway is about the worst thing to pick.  People with persistent Amway losses do not do well in Tax Court.  The other is that if you expect that a side activity will ultimately be profitable, you might want to consider suspending the losses under Code Section 469.  Although in principle, this does not immunize you from being attacked under Section 183, as a practical matter it does since you are not getting a current benefit.   You will get the benefit when the activity becomes profitable or you abandon it.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.