Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
11632
1theleasofus
2paradise
2theleastofus
storyparadox3
5confidencegames
LillianFaderman
11albion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
8albion'
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
1transcendentalist
lifeinmiddlemarch2
10abion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2gucci
1empireofpain
2lookingforthegoodwar
12albion
George F Wil...360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
storyparadox2
1confidencegames
1lauber
1lafayette
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
2albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
13albion
1paradide
2defense
1gucci
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
9albion
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
5albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
1falsewitness
2falsewitness
Learned Hand 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
2transadentilist
399
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Storyparadox1
2jesusandjohnwayne
6confidencegames
3theleastofus
2confidencegames
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
6albion
3defense
3paradise
499
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
14albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
2lafayette
299
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1madoff
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
4confidencegames
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
7confidencegames
1trap
4albion
3confidencegames
Maria Popova 360x1000
1defense
1albion
Edmund Burke 360x1000
199
7albion
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2trap
Is Tax Court Rebelling Against Supreme Court?

Is Tax Court Rebelling Against Supreme Court?

The “not liable” argument appears to have a very powerful hold on the imagination of alternative tax theorists.   You kind of almost have to admire someone like Mr. Thomas who racks up the sanctions making it.  It might actually not be such a bad thing if the Supremes would take a couple of these cases and clear the air with a couple of 9-0 decisions.  In the meantime, even if you are convinced of the validity of these arguments you should recognize that there is no point in raising them with the IRS or in the Tax Court.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.