2defense
2falsewitness
1theleasofus
1albion
199
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
13albion
1paradide
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
3theleastofus
Richard Posner 360x1000
11632
2lookingforthegoodwar
Maria Popova 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
14albion
1gucci
2transadentilist
2lafayette
11albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Storyparadox1
3defense
1transcendentalist
499
5albion
5confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2jesusandjohnwayne
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1madoff
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
3albion
2trap
1empireofpain
Betty Friedan 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
1trap
2theleastofus
LillianFaderman
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
4confidencegames
399
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
3confidencegames
1confidencegames
AlexRosenberg
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
2confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
299
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1lafayette
storyparadox3
7albion
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
2paradise
4albion
1falsewitness
1lauber
12albion
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
6confidencegames
9albion
10abion
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
6albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
2albion
8albion'
storyparadox2
Tad Friend 360x1000
7confidencegames
3paradise
1defense
2gucci
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Is Tax Court Rebelling Against Supreme Court?

Is Tax Court Rebelling Against Supreme Court?

The “not liable” argument appears to have a very powerful hold on the imagination of alternative tax theorists.   You kind of almost have to admire someone like Mr. Thomas who racks up the sanctions making it.  It might actually not be such a bad thing if the Supremes would take a couple of these cases and clear the air with a couple of 9-0 decisions.  In the meantime, even if you are convinced of the validity of these arguments you should recognize that there is no point in raising them with the IRS or in the Tax Court.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.