Is Tax Court Rebelling Against Supreme Court?
The “not liable” argument appears to have a very powerful hold on the imagination of alternative tax theorists. You kind of almost have to admire someone like Mr. Thomas who racks up the sanctions making it. It might actually not be such a bad thing if the Supremes would take a couple of these cases and clear the air with a couple of 9-0 decisions. In the meantime, even if you are convinced of the validity of these arguments you should recognize that there is no point in raising them with the IRS or in the Tax Court.
Is Kent Hovind A Tax Protester?
What is really intriguing about the movement is that it seems to be immune from acknowledging its losses. When a former friend got caught up in the movement, I spent a lot of time looking into his various arguments. Before the courts lost their patience with arguments they considered frivolous, there were rulings on issues such as wages being income and the sixteenth amendment having actually passed. Those rulings made no impression. The answer is that “The courts are corrupt”.
Follow Me
Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.