199
6albion
1albion
1trap
Edmund Burke 360x1000
9albion
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
4confidencegames
1theleasofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
storyparadox3
Storyparadox1
Learned Hand 360x1000
2confidencegames
13albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
6confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
5confidencegames
1madoff
4albion
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1paradide
1gucci
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1lafayette
2trap
AlexRosenberg
2falsewitness
2defense
7confidencegames
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
3theleastofus
1transcendentalist
Tad Friend 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
10abion
1defense
2albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
499
2gucci
lifeinmiddlemarch1
storyparadox2
11albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1falsewitness
3paradise
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Maria Popova 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
3albion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
3defense
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
1empireofpain
2paradise
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2theleastofus
Richard Posner 360x1000
14albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
8albion'
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2lafayette
12albion
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
3confidencegames
1lookingforthegoodwar
2transadentilist
1confidencegames
5albion
7albion
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
299
399
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1lauber
11632
Do Women CPAs Just Need To Lean In ?

Do Women CPAs Just Need To Lean In ?

Personally, I don’t think public accounting’s “women at the top problem” will be solved by women reading “Lean In” and changing their ways.  It will be solved when a few score women directors, senior managers and income partners walk out and start a firm.  I’d be willing to bet that Womanpower CPAs would have one of the top 4 spots within a decade and transform the industry.

read more
Not Good For Real Estate Loss When Tax Court Judge Says Purports

Not Good For Real Estate Loss When Tax Court Judge Says Purports

This is something that a lot of people trip up on, because these rules are so confusing.  The real estate pro status just gets you out of the “per-se” rule.  You still have to show that you “materially participated” in each of your properties.  The gold standard of material participation is 500 hours, which, of course, is impossible if you have several properties.  You are, however, allowed to elect to aggregate your properties into a single activity for purposes of measuring participation.  The Bugarins failed to make the election.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.