Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
11632
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2defense
storyparadox3
3albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1lauber
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
399
AlexRosenberg
5albion
2trap
1falsewitness
5confidencegames
2gucci
1empireofpain
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
2paradise
199
1defense
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2transadentilist
499
12albion
7confidencegames
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1madoff
1lookingforthegoodwar
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1trap
1confidencegames
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
6albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
7albion
1theleasofus
Storyparadox1
9albion
6confidencegames
2jesusandjohnwayne
1transcendentalist
1albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
storyparadox2
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
13albion
1gucci
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2theleastofus
3theleastofus
11albion
2albion
3defense
2lookingforthegoodwar
3paradise
4albion
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
1lafayette
Richard Posner 360x1000
10abion
14albion
2lafayette
2confidencegames
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1paradide
299
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
3confidencegames
2falsewitness
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
4confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
8albion'
Do Women CPAs Just Need To Lean In ?

Do Women CPAs Just Need To Lean In ?

Personally, I don’t think public accounting’s “women at the top problem” will be solved by women reading “Lean In” and changing their ways.  It will be solved when a few score women directors, senior managers and income partners walk out and start a firm.  I’d be willing to bet that Womanpower CPAs would have one of the top 4 spots within a decade and transform the industry.

read more
Not Good For Real Estate Loss When Tax Court Judge Says Purports

Not Good For Real Estate Loss When Tax Court Judge Says Purports

This is something that a lot of people trip up on, because these rules are so confusing.  The real estate pro status just gets you out of the “per-se” rule.  You still have to show that you “materially participated” in each of your properties.  The gold standard of material participation is 500 hours, which, of course, is impossible if you have several properties.  You are, however, allowed to elect to aggregate your properties into a single activity for purposes of measuring participation.  The Bugarins failed to make the election.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.