Betty Friedan 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1transcendentalist
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1theleasofus
2confidencegames
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2transadentilist
1lauber
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
11albion
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
3paradise
14albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1madoff
499
Richard Posner 360x1000
Storyparadox1
2jesusandjohnwayne
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
8albion'
1confidencegames
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2theleastofus
5albion
storyparadox2
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
Tad Friend 360x1000
399
299
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2albion
11632
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
7confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
1gucci
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
2falsewitness
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
3albion
4albion
3defense
4confidencegames
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
George F Wil...360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
LillianFaderman
10abion
2defense
5confidencegames
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
3confidencegames
3theleastofus
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
2trap
1paradide
2gucci
2paradise
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
1lafayette
1trap
1defense
storyparadox3
2lafayette
AlexRosenberg
1albion
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
199
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
6confidencegames
9albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
13albion
1falsewitness
1empireofpain
6albion
12albion
7albion

Originally published on Forbes.com.

As the Paycheck Protection Program unfolded, one of the biggest disappointments was IRS giving notice that payments made under the program would not be deductible. A few foresighted souls had seen that coming, but the general view was that they would be deductible, since denying the deductions made the provision of the act indicating that loan forgiveness was not taxable income kind of pointless.

Help May Be On The Way

There is a good chance that there will be further clarification on this matter, but I would not rule out the situation not changing given the chaotic nature of our politics. So I thought it would be worth taking a look at the strategy of taking the deduction anyway – Notice 2020-32 to the contrary notwithstanding.

I contacted AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). As we were going back and forth, they issued a press release supporting a legislative fix that is in the works

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) expressed its support for S. 3612 – the Small Business Expense Protection Act of 2020 – in a letter thanking Senators John Cornyn (R-TX), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Tom Carper (D-DE) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA).”

It is clear that Congress intended to allow a full deduction for PPP related expenses…This important legislation helps ensure that small business taxpayers affected by the ongoing pandemic will receive the full intended benefits of the CARES Act” (Emphasis added)

What If Help Does Not Arrive

When it comes to whether we have support for taking the deduction absent additional legislation AICPA is less sanguine.

They gave me a statement from Amy Wang, Senior Manager for Tax Policy and Advocacy:

CPAs would not advise their clients to take a deduction for ordinary business expenses (related to forgiven PPP loans) because the IRS/Treasury Notice 2020-32 is very clear that the expenses are not deductible if resulting from loan forgiveness.

Also, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has publicly defended IRS Notice 2020-32

For The Bold

You might want to print this out and put it in a tickler file for when the time comes to file 2020 returns. If there is no further guidance from Congress or the IRS, consider taking the deduction anyway particularly if 2020 turns out to be a loss year even without the deduction.

In the just making the loss bigger scenario, you will be having the argument with the IRS relative to a refund claim from your loss carryback. It would be prudent to clearly disclose what you are doing.

Just remember, you didn’t get the advice from the AICPA. You got it from a former member, who is too cheap to keep paying the dues.

Somebody Will Do It

I’m going to stick my neck out and predict that quite a few taxpayers will take the deduction, many of whom will be blissfully unaware of the notice. If the IRS decides to pay attention to the matter, somebody will litigate it and I really think it could go either way.

So if you are not bold, put this in your tickler file for late 2023. You can think about putting in protective refund claims. Be sure not to cut the deadline close. Given how long these things take, we won’t know the answer till maybe 2025 at the earliest, but nothing ventured nothing gained.

Another County Heard From

Attorney John Anthony Castro is rather passionate that the IRS is wrong and is offering to write opinion letters and prepare returns on that basis. I have published his detailed argument and my concerns with it on Your Tax Matters Partner.