Most Recent Posts
Has Mind Control Conspiracy Captured IRS?
Ernie founded Defender because he like many other people was a victim of M attacks. Defender operates in State G, but chose to incorporate in State D, “due to their advantageous tax strategies for business owners and entrepreneurs and also corporate veil protection for business”. (I think D might be Delaware, but would not rule out Nevada). Ernie had exhausted his personal investments paying expenses for equipment, supplies, consulting services, and start-up costs. He contacted a company F (Let’s call them Funhouse) which provided a consultant for marketing, an asset protection planner, and a nonprofit specialist. The Funhouse team took care of registration and the application for exempt status (Form 1023). The Funhouse team also agreed to “find grant funds and compile a list of possible donors” that would be sympathetic to the cause. The Funhouse group would also help Defender get a line of credit.
Don’t Leave Money To Children Buried Under IRS Liens
There is a pretty strong impulse among parents to treat their children equally when it comes to inheritance. There are times when this impulse should be overridden. If one of your children is burdened by tax liens that are well beyond their prospective inheritance leaving money to that child is equivalent to leaving money to the IRS. Worse you are likely involving the other children in the tax problems since the executor of the estate will probably not just roll over and turn the money over to the IRS. The litigation costs will eat into the estate.
Veteran Activist Mourns His Mentor
I'd like to say that Tom Cahill needs no introduction. Maybe he doesn't to you. That fellow shaking hands with Tom Cahill was President of the United States at the...
Obamacare Upheld Against Another Challenge – Court Rules Against Sissel
So it was not a mandate, really. It is a tax, which gave Mr. Sissel another opening. Bills to raise revenue are supposed to start in the House of Representatives (Origination Clause). Mr. Sissel’s reading of the legislative history indicated that there was a tax bill that started in the House, that had nothing to do with health care. The Senate gutted that bill and put in the Affordable Care Act. So really, the bill started in the Senate.
Apparently, we won’t have to sort through that legislative mishegas, because the Court ruled that even though the mandate is a tax, it is not designed to raise revenue, even though it may raise quite a bit of revenue.
Retailer Can Only Deduct Perks When Redeemed
Accordingly, whether a customer paid something for the purchase of gas or nothing, petitioner’s obligation to redeem fuelperks! was subject to a condition precedent that could be satisfied only after the close of petitioner’s tax year. We find that petitioner’s liability for outstanding fuelperks! became fixed upon their redemption, not when the customer earned the fuelperks! as petitioner contends. We thus hold that the claimed deductions for the outstanding fuelperks liabilities do not satisfy section 461(h)(4) and section 1.461-1(a)(2), Income Tax Regs.
Kent Hovind’s Battle With The IRS In Retrospect
In my post yesterday, I noted that Kent Hovind, Doctor Dino, is facing a new criminal charge related to filing a motion in defiance of an injunction. I have been following this story for some time and thought that this might be a good point to do a round-up of the coverage I have provided so far. You may note a little bit of repetition as in most of the posts I try to give a brief discussion of the possibly oxymoronic concept of “creation science”. Maybe you can decide whether my understanding has been, if you will excuse the expression, evolving.
Time To Let Kent Hovind Go Home?
This “renewed” contempt order, made at the end of the petitioner’s 10 year sentence after the government has liquidated the properties which form the basis for the 2012 injunction, creates a rebuttable presumption that this July 8, 2014 motions is retaliation against the petitioner for him exercising his constitutional right to redress and appeal in furtherance of exposing the government’s aforementioned misconduct.
Pulling IRS Into Your Business Dispute Might Not Be Such A Good Idea
According to the decision, Mr. Turnoy and Mr. Shiner had an agreement to equally divide the commissions on the sale of certain life insurance policies. The policies were issued in November 2012. Mr. Turnoy claimed that the commissions totaled $298,119.81. Mr. Shiner believed that there was more. Mr. Turnoy issued a check in the amount of $149,059.91 to Mr. Shiner in December of 2012. It doesn’t seem that rounding the half cent in his favor made Mr. Shiner happy. He was upset about something else.
The check bore a restrictive endorsement that indicated that acceptance of it would constitute full satisfaction of the disputed debt. Mr. Shiner was not going for that. Mr. Shiner started a lawsuit and returned the check. By that time Mr. Turnoy had already issued him a 1099.
Failure To Withhold Does Not Excuse Failure To Pay
The main disadvantage to the “independent contractor” that is a clear benefit to the “not an employer” concerns FICA/Self-employment tax. An employer has to match FICA, but the self-employed have to pay both the employee and employer share. There is something that disgruntled former “independent contractors” can do about the matter if they are not afraid of burning bridges. They can file Form 8919 to claim the FICA match your “employer” should have paid. I have this sneaking suspicion that the IRS might not actually have the resources to chase most of the former employers, so it might not even turn out to be a bridge burner. Still, it is not something to be done lightly
Social Security Disability Taxation – Curious And Confusing According to Tax Court
The disparate treatment of private and public disability benefits for tax purposes is curious and somewhat confusing. Under these circumstances, petitioners, who do not have tax expertise, sought the advice of two certified public accountants who counseled them that their benefits were not taxable.