Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
7confidencegames
storyparadox3
5albion
2defense
1empireofpain
12albion
3defense
6albion
2transadentilist
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
3confidencegames
9albion
14albion
storyparadox2
7albion
8albion'
2lafayette
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1falsewitness
2jesusandjohnwayne
1paradide
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
1madoff
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
11albion
2lookingforthegoodwar
2trap
3albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
1jesusandjohnwayne
499
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
11632
2falsewitness
Storyparadox1
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
2albion
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
1defense
1trap
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
199
AlexRosenberg
2gucci
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
4confidencegames
1confidencegames
10abion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1lafayette
2theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2paradise
4albion
3paradise
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1lauber
299
1albion
1gucci
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2confidencegames
1transcendentalist
1theleasofus
5confidencegames
399
13albion
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
6confidencegames

 

kelvin octa at Pexels

This was originally published on PAOO on July 15th, 2010.  After nearly a decade of blogging, this remains the funniest decision I have ever encountered.

Free Fertility Foundation v. Com 135 TC 2

I had originally thought of calling this “You Can’t Make This Stuff Up”, but I figured I’ll get in enough trouble without quoting Don Imus. Free Fertility Foundation v. Com 135 TC 2 sounds like something you might read in Onion, but it is a genuine tax court decision. I had noted its precursor back when I was not tax blogging and might have got around to it.

PLR 200736307 and related PLR 200737044 revoked the exempt status of a nameless organization whose charitable purpose was the provision of donated sperm to worthy women. The IRS (they don’t say how) determined that 88% of said sperm if you will excuse the expression, came from the same donor, who along with his father founded and ran the organization, The canned language of one of the rulings invites the organizers to apply to the Tax Court for declaratory judgment. Apparently they did.

So we are able to get details. Failure to obtain exempt status has not put the foundation under. You can get all the details on http://www.freedonr.com/. The donor catalog (which has one entry) has extensive information on the intellectual achievements of the donor including for example :

4th grade: 3rd place in school science fair with science project entitled “Using Red Cabbage Juice to Determine Acidity”.

I guess that is something that a prospective mom would want to know about.

At any rate the Tax Court went along with the IRS on this one. It boils down to his exempt purpose not benefiting a broad enough class of people. The petitioner claimed it was a very broad class indeed namely all women in the world capable of bearing children. The tax court thought the class somewhat more limited – namely women who want to bear his children. In prefacing their decision they did however make the following observation :

The free provision of sperm may, under appropriate circumstances, be a charitable activity.