Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
storyparadox2
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
2theleastofus
AlexRosenberg
7albion
1madoff
2paradise
5albion
2transadentilist
1lauber
Storyparadox1
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
3defense
1confidencegames
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1lafayette
1theleasofus
6confidencegames
499
Richard Posner 360x1000
3theleastofus
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
2trap
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
11632
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
9albion
1trap
1falsewitness
Learned Hand 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1transcendentalist
2gucci
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1empireofpain
7confidencegames
12albion
3paradise
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
3confidencegames
2confidencegames
1lookingforthegoodwar
Gilgamesh 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
4albion
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
storyparadox3
3albion
399
1defense
1gucci
2lookingforthegoodwar
George F Wil...360x1000
299
5confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
199
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
6albion
2lafayette
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
1albion
11albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
4confidencegames
1paradide
Edmund Burke 360x1000
14albion
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
LillianFaderman
2defense
Betty Friedan 360x1000
8albion'
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
13albion
10abion
2falsewitness
1jesusandjohnwayne
2albion
Originally Published on forbes.com on July 18th, 2011
______________________________________
The Patient Protection Care Act of 2010, sometimes derisively referred to as ObamaCare, has a lot of elements.  There is a heated constitutional argument going on as to whether doing nothing (i.e. not buying health insurance) constitutes interstate commerce.  I’ve written about that previously.  That part of the law is not effective yet.  At lease one element of the law has gone into effect.  The law added Section 5000B to the Internal Revenue.  5000B is an excise tax on indoor tanning services.  Whatever the charge is for your indoor tanning services  10% is added to it.  I guess that is to help pay for all the bad health things that indoor tanning does to people.  At the moment I’m sitting here with a literally crippling sun burn from the free outdoor tanning service provided by the universe.  That’s one way to beat the excise tax.  For those of you, who like to risk skin cancer indoors, though, the IRS has given you a blueprint for beating the new excise tax.
I feel bad about passing this along. My only defense is the motto that I have on my former main blogging site:
Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so,rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.  Judge Learned Hand
That was the anthem of the tax shelter industry in the 1980′s.  So here is the secret to beating the excise tax on tanning services.  Use your bonus points to pay for tanning services. This is not some creative scheme.  It comes straight from the IRS Chief Counsel (CCA 201128024):
Reward points redeemed by customers in exchange for indoor tanning services aren’t subject to indoor tanning services excise tax, and such applies only to cash paid for services to extent that any cash is paid in addition to points in exchange for indoor tanning services. And, there may be permissible methods to calculate taxable portion of bundled services other than ratio method under Reg § 49.5000B-1T(d)(3) .