2gucci
1lauber
1paradide
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
7albion
3theleastofus
8albion'
2defense
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
1lafayette
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
1defense
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
LillianFaderman
2lafayette
499
1falsewitness
1empireofpain
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1confidencegames
7confidencegames
13albion
storyparadox3
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1theleasofus
1albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
9albion
storyparadox2
2confidencegames
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
3paradise
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
2theleastofus
2falsewitness
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
6confidencegames
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
2paradise
lifeinmiddlemarch1
10abion
4confidencegames
1jesusandjohnwayne
4albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
3confidencegames
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2trap
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2lookingforthegoodwar
5confidencegames
12albion
Storyparadox1
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1gucci
2transadentilist
11albion
11632
Betty Friedan 360x1000
5albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2albion
14albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
299
3defense
199
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
1trap
Learned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
1transcendentalist
6albion
Richard Posner 360x1000
3albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
399
1madoff
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Originally Published on forbes.com on July 31st, 2011
______________________________________
A C corporation is a taxable entity.  Distributions that it makes to its shareholders are also, generally, taxable to them.  People who don’t want to pay tax twice on the same income will make an S election.  The shareholders are taxed on whatever the earnings are regardless of distributions.  Distributions of those earnings will generally not be taxable.  It’s pretty easy if the corporation made the election effective day one of its existence.  Former C corporations have other problems.  If too much (more than 25%) of its income is “passive” the corporation pays a tax on that income.  If that continues for three years, it loses its S election.
Included in passive income is “rents”, but not all rents.  If the corporation is doing enough to manage the property then the rent is not passive.  The corporation in this ruling was doing enough:
X employs b full-time employees who directly perform services relating to the Properties. X also contracts with independent contractors to provide various services. X, through its employees or through the independent contractors, provides certain services with respect to the Properties, including: property inspection, common area maintenance and repair, including carpeting and painting; janitorial and cleaning services; maintenance and repair of building structural components, including roofs and facades; upkeep and repair of building systems (heating, air conditioning, plumbing, water and sewer, electrical and lighting); parking lot maintenance; landscape maintenance; snow removal; trash collection; pest control; providing security personnel; and the approval and supervision of capital improvements. X, Sub 1, Sub 2, and LLC or independent contractors also perform leasing and administrative functions, including: purchasing and developing new properties; negotiating and drafting individual leases; showing properties to prospective tenants; andhiring and supervising personnel assigned to perform theproperty management functions.
So the rental income of an S corporation that actively manages the real estate is not passive ? That is what the ruling says, but be sure not to make that statement in isolation.  It is valid for the S corporation sting tax and not losing an S election because of “passive” income.  There is also Code Section 469, the passive actvity loss rules. Those rules require us to put our trade or business activities into different buckets.  Losses from an activity in the passive bucket are suspended unless there is income from other activities in the same bucket (Losses are released when an activity is entirely disposed.)  Under those rules rental activities are “per se” passive.  There are, of course, exceptions to that rule involving items rented for very short periods or where the rental includes a lot of additional service, but that is not what is going on in this situation.  So the activity will still be “passive” for purposes of the passive activity loss rules.