11632
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
1lafayette
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
3albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
6confidencegames
8albion'
1defense
Learned Hand 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
2defense
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2transadentilist
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1theleasofus
5albion
Maria Popova 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2falsewitness
1lauber
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
12albion
2confidencegames
2jesusandjohnwayne
4albion
5confidencegames
4confidencegames
6albion
2lafayette
Gilgamesh 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1falsewitness
LillianFaderman
9albion
11albion
14albion
199
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
2theleastofus
1paradide
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
2albion
499
1albion
Betty Friedan 360x1000
3confidencegames
1trap
1transcendentalist
1gucci
George F Wil...360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1empireofpain
1lookingforthegoodwar
3theleastofus
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
2lookingforthegoodwar
Tad Friend 360x1000
2gucci
1confidencegames
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
13albion
1madoff
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
3defense
399
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Storyparadox1
2paradise
7confidencegames
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
storyparadox3
3paradise
2trap
7albion
299
storyparadox2
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
10abion
Originally Published on forbes.com on July 31st, 2011
______________________________________
A C corporation is a taxable entity.  Distributions that it makes to its shareholders are also, generally, taxable to them.  People who don’t want to pay tax twice on the same income will make an S election.  The shareholders are taxed on whatever the earnings are regardless of distributions.  Distributions of those earnings will generally not be taxable.  It’s pretty easy if the corporation made the election effective day one of its existence.  Former C corporations have other problems.  If too much (more than 25%) of its income is “passive” the corporation pays a tax on that income.  If that continues for three years, it loses its S election.
Included in passive income is “rents”, but not all rents.  If the corporation is doing enough to manage the property then the rent is not passive.  The corporation in this ruling was doing enough:
X employs b full-time employees who directly perform services relating to the Properties. X also contracts with independent contractors to provide various services. X, through its employees or through the independent contractors, provides certain services with respect to the Properties, including: property inspection, common area maintenance and repair, including carpeting and painting; janitorial and cleaning services; maintenance and repair of building structural components, including roofs and facades; upkeep and repair of building systems (heating, air conditioning, plumbing, water and sewer, electrical and lighting); parking lot maintenance; landscape maintenance; snow removal; trash collection; pest control; providing security personnel; and the approval and supervision of capital improvements. X, Sub 1, Sub 2, and LLC or independent contractors also perform leasing and administrative functions, including: purchasing and developing new properties; negotiating and drafting individual leases; showing properties to prospective tenants; andhiring and supervising personnel assigned to perform theproperty management functions.
So the rental income of an S corporation that actively manages the real estate is not passive ? That is what the ruling says, but be sure not to make that statement in isolation.  It is valid for the S corporation sting tax and not losing an S election because of “passive” income.  There is also Code Section 469, the passive actvity loss rules. Those rules require us to put our trade or business activities into different buckets.  Losses from an activity in the passive bucket are suspended unless there is income from other activities in the same bucket (Losses are released when an activity is entirely disposed.)  Under those rules rental activities are “per se” passive.  There are, of course, exceptions to that rule involving items rented for very short periods or where the rental includes a lot of additional service, but that is not what is going on in this situation.  So the activity will still be “passive” for purposes of the passive activity loss rules.