2theleastofus
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
storyparadox3
199
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
9albion
7confidencegames
1gucci
3defense
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
12albion
1falsewitness
1lafayette
2albion
2paradise
2jesusandjohnwayne
1transcendentalist
3albion
1madoff
storyparadox2
1theleasofus
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
LillianFaderman
2trap
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
4albion
Betty Friedan 360x1000
1albion
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
299
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
399
5albion
11albion
499
3paradise
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
5confidencegames
1trap
Learned Hand 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
1lauber
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
6albion
2lafayette
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
10abion
2lookingforthegoodwar
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
2gucci
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1paradide
2defense
Storyparadox1
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1empireofpain
George F Wil...360x1000
7albion
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
3theleastofus
8albion'
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
1confidencegames
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
13albion
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2falsewitness
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
2confidencegames
Tad Friend 360x1000
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
1defense
11632
3confidencegames
2transadentilist
Edmund Burke 360x1000
14albion
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
6confidencegames
4confidencegames

In my interview with Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein, I only asked her one tax question that was not covered in the Green Party Platform.  The question concerned the parsonage exclusion, Code Section 107.  Code Section 107 allows  a “minister of the gospel” to exclude from income amounts received as a housing allowance, provided the amount is spent on housing.  There is no dollar limit to the amount that can be excluded.  It is most commonly a modest benefit, but televangelists and mega-church ministers can exclude hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Putting aside perceived abuse of the benefit, there are people who believe that the benefit violates the First Amendment.

I have written quite a bit about the parsonage exclusion and have had several guest posts from people with a variety of views on the issue.  Given the opportunity to interview a candidate for President and failing to ask her about the parsonage exclusion would have risked forfeiting half my fan base, in particular my most reliable commenter, Rober Baty, retired IRS appeals officer and bane of the basketball ministers.  I just had to do it.  I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.   I specifically asked Dr. Stein about the current suit by the Freedom From Religion Foundation challenging the exclusion.  The Justice Department will defend the constitutionality of a statute except in the rare circumstance in which the administration determines that the constitutionality of the statute is indefensible.  That is what happened to the Defense of Marriage Act.  I asked Dr. Stein if she would consider ordering the Justice Department to give Code Section 107 the same treatment they gave DOMA.

I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.  It was pretty apparent that the issue was new to her so she would not give a certain answer without studying it.  That is understandable.  She then went on to say that it did appear inappropriate to give special favors to church employees.  Ask a presidential candidate a question that she did not prepare for and get a principled answer.  You won’t see that on television, but you can see it here

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

Originally published on Forbes.com Oct 9th, 2012