2falsewitness
1falsewitness
9albion
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1transcendentalist
499
2gucci
1lookingforthegoodwar
1confidencegames
12albion
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
1jesusandjohnwayne
1theleasofus
3albion
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
7albion
6confidencegames
8albion'
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
1gucci
5confidencegames
4albion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
7confidencegames
2confidencegames
2trap
George F Wil...360x1000
399
11632
11albion
2theleastofus
2defense
Richard Posner 360x1000
5albion
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
3theleastofus
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1lauber
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1paradide
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
storyparadox2
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
3paradise
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
1lafayette
2paradise
10abion
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
2lookingforthegoodwar
1trap
3confidencegames
1defense
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
299
1empireofpain
13albion
storyparadox3
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
1madoff
LillianFaderman
3defense
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
14albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
1albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
2lafayette
Learned Hand 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
4confidencegames
2albion
Storyparadox1
2jesusandjohnwayne
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
2transadentilist
Maria Popova 360x1000
199
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
6albion

In my interview with Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein, I only asked her one tax question that was not covered in the Green Party Platform.  The question concerned the parsonage exclusion, Code Section 107.  Code Section 107 allows  a “minister of the gospel” to exclude from income amounts received as a housing allowance, provided the amount is spent on housing.  There is no dollar limit to the amount that can be excluded.  It is most commonly a modest benefit, but televangelists and mega-church ministers can exclude hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Putting aside perceived abuse of the benefit, there are people who believe that the benefit violates the First Amendment.

I have written quite a bit about the parsonage exclusion and have had several guest posts from people with a variety of views on the issue.  Given the opportunity to interview a candidate for President and failing to ask her about the parsonage exclusion would have risked forfeiting half my fan base, in particular my most reliable commenter, Rober Baty, retired IRS appeals officer and bane of the basketball ministers.  I just had to do it.  I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.   I specifically asked Dr. Stein about the current suit by the Freedom From Religion Foundation challenging the exclusion.  The Justice Department will defend the constitutionality of a statute except in the rare circumstance in which the administration determines that the constitutionality of the statute is indefensible.  That is what happened to the Defense of Marriage Act.  I asked Dr. Stein if she would consider ordering the Justice Department to give Code Section 107 the same treatment they gave DOMA.

I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.  It was pretty apparent that the issue was new to her so she would not give a certain answer without studying it.  That is understandable.  She then went on to say that it did appear inappropriate to give special favors to church employees.  Ask a presidential candidate a question that she did not prepare for and get a principled answer.  You won’t see that on television, but you can see it here

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

Originally published on Forbes.com Oct 9th, 2012