2gucci
1lookingforthegoodwar
299
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
2theleastofus
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
6albion
2albion
1empireofpain
3albion
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
2transadentilist
1falsewitness
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
199
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Storyparadox1
lifeinmiddlemarch2
Maria Popova 360x1000
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
1lafayette
8albion'
13albion
1jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Tad Friend 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
1theleasofus
storyparadox2
George F Wil...360x1000
1albion
storyparadox3
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
399
1paradide
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
3defense
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
12albion
11albion
7confidencegames
1confidencegames
1trap
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
LillianFaderman
499
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
10abion
2lafayette
3paradise
14albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
2jesusandjohnwayne
Richard Posner 360x1000
5albion
3theleastofus
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1gucci
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
1madoff
4albion
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Gilgamesh 360x1000
2falsewitness
9albion
2defense
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
7albion
11632
1lauber
3confidencegames
5confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
4confidencegames
2confidencegames
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
2trap
1transcendentalist
1defense
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
6confidencegames
2lookingforthegoodwar
2paradise
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000

In my interview with Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein, I only asked her one tax question that was not covered in the Green Party Platform.  The question concerned the parsonage exclusion, Code Section 107.  Code Section 107 allows  a “minister of the gospel” to exclude from income amounts received as a housing allowance, provided the amount is spent on housing.  There is no dollar limit to the amount that can be excluded.  It is most commonly a modest benefit, but televangelists and mega-church ministers can exclude hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Putting aside perceived abuse of the benefit, there are people who believe that the benefit violates the First Amendment.

I have written quite a bit about the parsonage exclusion and have had several guest posts from people with a variety of views on the issue.  Given the opportunity to interview a candidate for President and failing to ask her about the parsonage exclusion would have risked forfeiting half my fan base, in particular my most reliable commenter, Rober Baty, retired IRS appeals officer and bane of the basketball ministers.  I just had to do it.  I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.   I specifically asked Dr. Stein about the current suit by the Freedom From Religion Foundation challenging the exclusion.  The Justice Department will defend the constitutionality of a statute except in the rare circumstance in which the administration determines that the constitutionality of the statute is indefensible.  That is what happened to the Defense of Marriage Act.  I asked Dr. Stein if she would consider ordering the Justice Department to give Code Section 107 the same treatment they gave DOMA.

I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.  It was pretty apparent that the issue was new to her so she would not give a certain answer without studying it.  That is understandable.  She then went on to say that it did appear inappropriate to give special favors to church employees.  Ask a presidential candidate a question that she did not prepare for and get a principled answer.  You won’t see that on television, but you can see it here

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

Originally published on Forbes.com Oct 9th, 2012