Storyparadox1
3theleastofus
2theleastofus
Tad Friend 360x1000
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
2paradise
1defense
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
3confidencegames
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2trap
299
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
2lafayette
11albion
199
1lauber
1falsewitness
11632
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
7confidencegames
1paradide
storyparadox3
4confidencegames
2gucci
1trap
2lookingforthegoodwar
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
Maria Popova 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
7albion
2defense
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
2jesusandjohnwayne
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
2falsewitness
2transadentilist
6confidencegames
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
2albion
14albion
3defense
3albion
4albion
5albion
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
LillianFaderman
Edmund Burke 360x1000
1lookingforthegoodwar
1transcendentalist
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
9albion
Richard Posner 360x1000
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1gucci
1empireofpain
1albion
5confidencegames
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
12albion
1theleasofus
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
399
lifeinmiddlemarch2
AlexRosenberg
1madoff
1confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
10abion
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
13albion
George F Wil...360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
storyparadox2
3paradise
499
1jesusandjohnwayne
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
8albion'
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
2confidencegames
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
1lafayette
6albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000

In my interview with Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein, I only asked her one tax question that was not covered in the Green Party Platform.  The question concerned the parsonage exclusion, Code Section 107.  Code Section 107 allows  a “minister of the gospel” to exclude from income amounts received as a housing allowance, provided the amount is spent on housing.  There is no dollar limit to the amount that can be excluded.  It is most commonly a modest benefit, but televangelists and mega-church ministers can exclude hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Putting aside perceived abuse of the benefit, there are people who believe that the benefit violates the First Amendment.

I have written quite a bit about the parsonage exclusion and have had several guest posts from people with a variety of views on the issue.  Given the opportunity to interview a candidate for President and failing to ask her about the parsonage exclusion would have risked forfeiting half my fan base, in particular my most reliable commenter, Rober Baty, retired IRS appeals officer and bane of the basketball ministers.  I just had to do it.  I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.   I specifically asked Dr. Stein about the current suit by the Freedom From Religion Foundation challenging the exclusion.  The Justice Department will defend the constitutionality of a statute except in the rare circumstance in which the administration determines that the constitutionality of the statute is indefensible.  That is what happened to the Defense of Marriage Act.  I asked Dr. Stein if she would consider ordering the Justice Department to give Code Section 107 the same treatment they gave DOMA.

I have to say I was very impressed by her answer.  It was pretty apparent that the issue was new to her so she would not give a certain answer without studying it.  That is understandable.  She then went on to say that it did appear inappropriate to give special favors to church employees.  Ask a presidential candidate a question that she did not prepare for and get a principled answer.  You won’t see that on television, but you can see it here

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

Originally published on Forbes.com Oct 9th, 2012