Maria Popova 360x1000
Gilgamesh 360x1000
3paradise
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch2
2paradise
5albion
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
13albion
1paradide
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Learned Hand 360x1000
1lafayette
11632
5confidencegames
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
AlexRosenberg
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2falsewitness
2theleastofus
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
storyparadox2
299
storyparadox3
LillianFaderman
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
199
1jesusandjohnwayne
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
7confidencegames
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
2gucci
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
1lauber
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
7albion
14albion
1defense
Storyparadox1
8albion'
1trap
3albion
6confidencegames
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
11albion
2jesusandjohnwayne
6albion
399
4confidencegames
3defense
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
lifeinmiddlemarch1
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
2transadentilist
2trap
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
2defense
1confidencegames
1falsewitness
3theleastofus
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
9albion
1madoff
12albion
2albion
499
1albion
10abion
1gucci
1transcendentalist
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
3confidencegames
Tad Friend 360x1000
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
1theleasofus
1empireofpain
2confidencegames
4albion
2lookingforthegoodwar
1lookingforthegoodwar
2lafayette
Stormy Daniels 360x1000

Your Tax Matters Partner Original Content by Peter J, Reilly

Steve McRae’s lawsuit against Kyle Curtis over the youtube channel  The NonSequitur Show has lit up a small section of the internet.  I stumbled into it, because there seems to be some overlap between people excited about this litigation and what I might call the Hovindology community If you want information on the case that is tied to original court filings along with legal analysis, the place to go is Nate the Lawyer.  I wish I had started there

The Case

Here is the case in a nutshell. Steve alleges that he and Kyle were 50/50 partners in The Non Sequitur Show under a verbal agreement, (We must here invoke the ghost of Samuel Goldwyn.  The remark “A verbal contract is not worth the paper it is written on.” may be falsely attributed to him, although it seems like something he should have said.) Steve allowed Kyle to have administrative rights over the site and the accounts that controlled revenue streams (I’m a little hazy on that) and ended up being shut out and did not receive any of the revenue.

Steve is seeking half the estimated revenue of $60,000 and control of the channel along with damages and costs.  Steve filed the complaint in a North Carolina court, as Kyle is a NC resident.  Kyle did not respond and Steve got a default judgment, which might have been the end of things, but now Kyle is claiming that he was not properly served so the show goes on.

How I Got On This

I was really delighted when Cheshire Viq lavished attention on my posts about Kent Hovind’s half-billion-dollar lawsuit.  She mentioned working with Steve McRae and alluded to the lawsuit.  Steve’s name rang a bell for me.  He and Robert Baty had been involved in what I considered a really dumb argument.  You can get the essence of it from Bob’s point of view here.

Bob runs a site called Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare. It follows Kent’s misgegas with an incredible intensity. Baty also keeps an eye on PACER for new Hovind related filings. The site or perhaps an email from Bob is how I picked up the recent Hovind lawsuit.

At any rate, Steve belonged to the group.  Somebody else on the group wrote that Steve had indicated that his graduation from the Navy Nuclear Power School was the equivalent of a Ph.D. Steve argues that he never said or wrote anything of the sort and asked Bob to delete the comment.  Bob refused disclaiming knowledge of whether it was true or false.  Steve quit the site.

It is not clear to me why this continues to be an argument.  The Navy Nuclear Power School is one of the most intellectually demanding schools in the military (of which there are many).  The statement that Steve denies making would at worst be a sort of “truthful hyperbole”.as our President refers to that sort of thing in Art of The Deal.

On the Baty side, it is a matter of somebody didn’t like the way you run your group, so he quit.  Other than a snide “Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out”, what is there to argue about?  Instead, he has a page on his “Great Debates” site dedicated to it.

At any rate, I was intrigued by the lawsuit, because I thought it might give me some insight into the business aspects of being a youtuber.  It also intrigued me because of my interest in partnership taxation.  And also I was concerned that there was a dispute dividing one of my longest-term favorite blogging buddies Robert Baty and Cheshire Viq who could become my new BFF based on her video.

First Glance

I lost interest pretty quickly when I saw that not much money was involved.  I should qualify that.  I had a rule with my kids that the word “only” could not be used in connection with any amount greater than four dollars.  So $60,000 is a lot of money.  In the context of litigation though it is not that much and could be eaten up pretty quickly.  In the context of there being a story, I totally don’t get it.

The tax aspects of the story which were alluded to in one of Steve’s videos interested me a bit but given the low stakes they seemed irrelevant.  I will pick that up later.

Interest Revives

Then sometime YTMP contributor, bane of the basketball ministers and Kent Hovind’s worst nightmare – Robert Baty alerted me to a youtube video he appeared in,  At well over three hours it is a significant lifespans investment. I got over an hour in before giving up.

Here is the discussion that Baty convinced me, possibly against my better judgment, to dive in.

There is a lengthy discussion of the service issue and a critique of another video in which the case is presented from Steve’s viewpoint.  Nate hosted a debate by people who go by Roohiff and Agrippa.

I have barely scratched the surface and there is already way too much material. Nonetheless, it appears that at least hundreds, possibly thousands of people are following this drama and signing up for either Team Steve or Team Kyle.

I am very sad that Baty has chosen Team Kyle given that Cheshire Viq is a strong Steve supporter.  Given that I feel compelled to remain neutral.

Shaking My Head

I have a really hard time figuring out how it is that this sort of dispute can energize so many people.  I do remember what it was like being in the leadership of a Unitratian Universalist congregation that was perennialy plagued by content free conflict.  One of the people who was a big player on the music committee which was like the Balkans producing more history than it could consume locallly told me that I my problem was that I was Aquarian and wanted everybody to get along.

Both Steve and Kyle get to continue to produce on youtube, which boils it down to an argument about sixty grand.  It makes me wonder if they are engaging in this dispute so publicly in order to build traffic.  Are Steve and Kyle frenemies?

So the only thing I can think of is that we are naturally tribal.  This particular youtube community has reached a point where it needs to divide about something,  Maybe someone could analyze this from the viewpoint of evolutionary biology.  Unfortrunately I am not qualified for that.

The Tax Angle

The tax part of the story comes from one of Steve’s videos which I can’t track back down.  He mentions that some people have been accusing him of running some sort of tax scam which he adamantly denies.  He then indicates that the incidence of taxation will fall on him when he is finally paid by Kyle.  That is not how it works.technically.

Given the low stakes it will probably work out that way and he won’t have any problem with that position.  But if, God forbid, these transactions were to be audited by the agent from hell (very unlikely), there is a technical error in that analysis and it makes a sort of cautionary tale for others who might team up in this sort of venture.

A partnership is an arrangement in which people agree to carry on business and divide profits.  Whether something is a partnership is a facts and circumstances question,  A partnership is referred to as a taxpayer because it has a filing requirement, but it is pretty much a pure flow-through.  Partners are taxed on their share of the income regardless of when it is distributed.

Given that it appears no partnership return was filed (which can produce nasty penalties) the overall situation is a tax clusterfuck if someone tried to sort it all out.

Blogger Nik Ritchie who is at least moderately famous ran into this problem when his career was taking off.  I covered the Tax Court decision that resulted. It is a cautionary tale.  If I were advising Steve I would encourage him to refer to his arrangement with Kyle as being a revenue-sharing agreement.

The Parallels

Given how many Hovindologists are involved in this some of the Parallels with Hovind are interesting.  Steve’s notion that taxable income can kind of be suspended is a little reminiscent of Kent’s non-statutory trusts. That one is pretty tenuous.  More to the point is the way in which control over the channel compares to Theo’s stealing Kent’s URL and Kent’s fight with Eric over the Creation Science website.  I think I recall Kent having trouble with another renegade webmaster earlier.

And then there is the matter of service, now the key legal issue in the McRae v Curtis suit.  That is what also threatens to kill Hovind’s half-billion-dollar lawsuit.  I noted in my first post on that that they might have a problem doing that properly and it seems that is playing out.

News To Kent

Many of the people involved in this seem to be at least marginally what I call Hovindologists.  A Hovindologist is someone who has some fascination with the Young Earth Creation mishegas put out by Kent Hovind, an independent Baptist minister who has never seen a right-oriented conspiracy theory he didn’t like just a little bit.  He also focuses a lot of energy on trying to undo his 2006 conviction on tax-related crimes.

I picked up the Kent Hovind story in 2012 from a Tax Court decision in the case of his long-suffering first wife Jo.  They were virgins when they got married and when Kent finished his long sentence (over eight years) he was shown to a separate bedroom when he got home.  I took that as a euphemism for no nookie. That is just a sample of the TMI contained in Kent Hovind videos.

I asked Kent Hovind whether he heard about the dispute between Steve and Kyle. He had not, but he may be looking into it.  Those of you who follow him will not be surprised to learn that he brought up Gideon who ended up having his adversaries fighting among themselves.