3theleastofus
Storyparadox1
1gucci
2jesusandjohnwayne
George M Cohan and Lerarned Hand 360x1000
1confidencegames
2defense
Thomas Piketty1 360x1000
Samuel Johnson 360x1000
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 360x1000
Margaret Fuller3 360x1000
Mary Ann Evans 360x1000
3confidencegames
Learned Hand 360x1000
Margaret Fuller2 360x1000
2gucci
1albion
Adam Gopnik 360x1000
11632
2albion
Spottswood William Robinson 360x1000
5confidencegames
2trap
James Gould Cozzens 360x1000
199
Margaret Fuller 2 360x1000
Richard Posner 360x1000
LillianFaderman
1defense
13albion
1lauber
1lookingforthegoodwar
Gilgamesh 360x1000
1trap
lifeinmiddlemarch1
3defense
4confidencegames
2confidencegames
Stormy Daniels 360x1000
storyparadox2
399
11albion
2paradise
Susie King Taylor 360x1000
499
3paradise
Margaret Fuller 360x1000
Anthony McCann1 360x1000
5albion
9albion
Margaret Fuller1 360x1000
12albion
Tad Friend 360x1000
7albion
Lafayette and Jefferson 360x1000
2theleastofus
1madoff
AlexRosenberg
Mark V Holmes 360x1000
Margaret Fuller4 360x1000
Brendan Beehan 360x1000
3albion
1transcendentalist
Maurice B Foley 360x1000
2transadentilist
Margaret Fuller5 360x1000
Betty Friedan 360x1000
10abion
2lafayette
Maria Popova 360x1000
George F Wil...360x1000
Edmund Burke 360x1000
4albion
2falsewitness
Susie King Taylor2 360x1000
6albion
Thomas Piketty3 360x1000
1empireofpain
8albion'
14albion
1lafayette
Anthony McCann2 360x1000
1falsewitness
2lookingforthegoodwar
Thomas Piketty2 360x1000
7confidencegames
1paradide
Office of Chief Counsel 360x1000
storyparadox3
1jesusandjohnwayne
1theleasofus
299
6confidencegames
lifeinmiddlemarch2
O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe v. OCU – Byers v. FC – Update!

O’Keefe was employed as a graphic design instructor.  Byers was employed as a coach and physical education instructor.  While both may be considered “ministers” under the theological concept of the “priesthood of believers”, neither can be shown to have been ministers as envisioned by the application of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine”.

read more

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.